• melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 hours ago

    That does it, I’m never installing Chrome again. I haven’t in years anyway because it’s garbage spyware, but still.

    • Pika@rekabu.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I haven’t in years anyway

      Exactly why they can pull off anything like that. People who still stay with Chrome are mostly those who’ll eat it up anyway.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I love software that acts without my consent or knowledge while atrophying my brain and wasting tremendous amounts of resources

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Chrome has added Auto Browse

    sit down, lean back, and watch the internet scroll by /s

    • Pika@rekabu.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Vivaldi is in big part closed source, so we literally don’t know what it does behind the scenes

      • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        closed source due to the small team but they’re also incredibly open about both the company the advocacy for the internet

        • Null User Object@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 hours ago

          closed source due to the small team

          There are open source projects created and managed by a single developer. A “small team” is not a reason to be closed source.

      • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The minority of Vivaldi is closed source from what I have read actually - specifically the stuff they have that makes its fancy UI work, but someone can correct me with a citation if that is not true.

        They state that about 95% of it is available to be read where 92% of that is open source from Chromium, 3% is open source from Vivaldi themselves, and the last 5% that is not available to be read is Vivaldi’s UI.

        https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/why-isnt-vivaldi-browser-open-source/

        Still far from open source or free software, but better than most people would think. I guess you would also have to trust them that it really is just the UI.

        • Pika@rekabu.ru
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Exactly. Yes, I know they claim it’s just the UI, and the sole purpose of closed-source code is to make it harder to steal innovative UI elements - but when it comes to something as sensitive as the browser, I’d like for these claims to be verifiable.

    • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Nah, Firefox. Anything based on the blink engine is vulnerable to upstream fuckiness.

      Ladybird is also getting there.

      • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Nah, Firefox. Anything based on the blink engine is vulnerable to upstream fuckiness.

        so aren’t firefox forks

        and ladybird might be nice but the dev outed himself as a right wing bigot

        • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Firefox forks are less vulnerable purely due to the fact that the main browser engine isnt being developed by a self interested advertising company. (See the recent manifest V3 and discontinuation of V2 shitshow for a example of googles stranglehold causing problems)

          & when it comes to browser engines I’ll set politics aside even if someone has views in very poor taste. The project overall is FOSS and thusly is being developed by hundreds of contributors, I’ve contributed a few bits and pieces for it even.

          Having an additional standalone browser engine serves as insurance against Mozilla doing a stupid and a bulwark against Google dominance.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Let’s give everyone an army of spambots! What could go wrong?”

    I’m gonna start reading books again.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know if he joking or not but seriously I started reading again regularly like a year ish ago and I think my attention span getting better. Just not spending as much time scrolling bullshit is a big W along with practicing a longer attention span weather it’s reading or something else. Go get a terry pratchet book !

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    This actually sounds interesting.

    “Find all comments on lemmy that are wrong. Respond explaining how they are wrong.”

    That would save me a lot of work.

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is one of those agents going to jerk off for you too? Who the fuck needs an agent to browse the web for them?

    • ssladam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s trying to solve a problem created by SEO slop. “Find me the cheapest car rental”… That’s actually hard to do now bc SEO grift. Rather than building a more honest system, you get “agents” to do the searching for you

      • itsathursday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        It didn’t make sense then, and it doesn’t make sense now. Keyword searches with an understanding of search syntax was always king.

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Keyword searches with an understanding of search syntax was always king.

          Isn’t that only because of the limitations of the available technology only being able to handle simple strings, though? Conversational computing has been a pipe dream since early sci-fi, where characters would talk to their computers as if they were human; George Jetson never spoke to Rosie in keyword queries.

          I feel like keyword search syntax being “king” is more of a symptom, than an intentional choice.

          • ainmosni@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You realise that the reason conversational computing is so popular in science fiction, is because it looks better on camera, right.

            • Tim@lemmy.snowgoons.ro
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              2 days ago

              This is a very good point - in books/dramas it helps the exposition to have a character you can relay half the plot details to. Similarly in radio dramas, every conversation between characters starts with saying each others names and a full recap of whatever the subject is… But nobody in the real world does or wants to talk like that.

              Real people just say “hey, is that thing fixed yet?”, not “hello Chris, you remember yesterday we were discussing the il problem with the Thing, and you proposed Cornfootling it; what happened?”

              When I want Alexa to turn on the lights, I want to just say “Alexa, turn on the lights”, not have a goddamned debate. And when I want to search for whatever the hell Cornfootling is, I just want to type “Cornfootling” and hit search.

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    I loathe (couldn’t figure out a synonym more than that) the word agentic. It sums up everything bad and wrong about AI.

  • tleb@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    They want to push all this shit in browsers so that they can start automatically buying shit once they’re selling ads

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      God, I hadn’t thought of that. It’s going to be like cancelling a cable subscription but worse.

  • Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    It will handle your socials, chats, your agenda, your website, your credit card, your vacations, your photos from the moment of activation to well after death…

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      All so you can spend more time generating value for your masters and overlords. Huzzah, we’ve eliminated the pesky scourge of free time!

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also so they can easily predict who is with them and who is against them. Who’s got the hot new ideas so they can beat them to market. Who might challenge the status quo.

        • Null User Object@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Who’s got the hot new ideas so they can beat them to market.

          Well, there’s an absolutely plausible motive that I hadn’t considered, yet. Fuuuuuuck.

      • Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No. The server will simply keep raising your kids after you’re gone and better than you ever could.

    • Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      If they marketed “Agentic AI” as a way for someone to disappear from the internet entirely and be replaced by AI, I’d finally get onboard.

      • Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Basically don’t know how to interpret “autobrowse” in any other way. Bit like “autopilot”, you “should” have the hands on the steering wheel but…

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You know what this is launching just in time for?

    Tax season.

    Cue* 10 million people getting audited because they let their browser file their taxes for them.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        He did say it makes screenshots of everything and sends it to a cloud AI for processing. I believe that. It’s also a good reason for not wanting it.

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          But nobody that has a functioning product has to fake their demo. This is extremely disturbing behavior when it comes to AI hype influencers

    • bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      In reality, it’s going to screw so much stuff up and do so many things you don’t want it to do, that you’re going end up spending a lot of time just correcting all the mistakes it makes.

      And when you’re not fighting to stop it from doing more things you don’t want it to do, you’re going spend your time worrying about what it will do next that you’re going have to fix.

      And unless you pay for the most expensive phone and the most expensive tier of service, they’ll probably dumb it down on purpose and your life is going be hard.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Mistake prevention is far better than mistake correction.

        I’ll be disabling that shit as soon as I install.