Maybe Linear?

Looks like their website became less telling than it was years ago. I think it was during the Atlassian force into the cloud where they showed up as a speedy/snappy, dev-focused issue tracking system. There’s a free tier if you want to try.

I always found Trac UI bad/unintuitive. I always disliked seeing Trac on a project.

“Robo”, whenever I search something: “Let me define these search terms for you, even when they are not something you can define like that or you already know all of that, and better.”

You can’t even disable that. Wasted LLM cost. On every search, I now give the response a thumbs down and flag the most fitting tag: Inappropriate.

Are you serious? That’s insane. I had no idea!

In February 2025, Williams Racing announced a record multi-year title sponsorship with Atlassian and will compete as Atlassian Williams Racing from the 2025 season of Formula One onwards. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlassian#Sponsorship

I hope they can drive faster than their software loads content.

Codeberg also offers private repos.

Only FOSS though

Sometimes, we do tolerate repositories that are not licensed optimally (e.g. due to historic reasons dating back decades).

Depending on how you read the FAQ entry, they may not explicitly talk about private non-commercial content, though.

They take a toy

It depends on contract. Your interpretation matches use as “should”. But there’s also use as “claims x” or “is claimed or said to be” which the quote refers to.

Ich soll - I should or I am asked to. Es soll [sein] - it is supposed to be or it supposedly is.

There’s another alternative: not reporting it as fact, butbeing open about the degree of certainty and the methodology.

“Someone says”, “rumor”, and “uncertain automated translation” don’t make for very convincing sources or journalistic credibility, of course. But being open about context does moreso than hiding it.

The article mentions how they’re trying and sighting different solutions.

CPU NPU requirements will mean longer support necessity for Windows 11.

If they go ahead with subscriptions, demand will certainly add additional demand for that. But I guess subscriptions would be to cover copilot cost. Given Microsoft’s interest in people upgrading to eventually reduce support surface, I have to assume it will be optional, for AI features. Following that reasoning, the NPU requirement may be optional too, only applicable to the AI features block.

But who knows, the whole thing is not driven by reasonable business decisions anyway.

Also, I had no idea there was a “gaming copilot”. Even after following links to the introduction news, I don’t get what it really does.

Yes, that’s what I read elsewhere. No guarantees in contract. So you can consider this to be bullshit or marketing. Even if it’s verbal agreements now, you can be sure they won’t matter.

There’s a German fan version too - in German.

I’ve also seen a single person do tasks, I think it was under the title of “until I get casted onto taskmaster” or something.

Taskmaster (UK). Free on YouTube, but it’s also a TV series, so I’ll count that.

There’s also precedent you can point to. Germany has implemented a reasonable system of digital identification and (seperable) condition confirmation (age gate).

There’s a good chance the situation will change significant in three years. It’s worth to at least wait for that while acting right now either way but without completely giving up already.

The US has labeled the EU its number one enemy. Destabilizing the EU as a goal isn’t very far fetched, even if not a primary goal.

EU passive stance can be seen as pragmatic or necessary, or injust and severely lacking depending on how you look at it.

It’s a tragedy other countries provide even passive support, and continue to support Israel even after Gaza genocide, which still continues, even if it’s not during or for this campaign specifically. Years of human rights and international law violations, and there’s no strong opposition or distancing. That initiative is hard to swallow.

Trump is already doing that, but through a different route. They don’t need to bomb there. They’re using other means.

“futurism has confirmed”. Later on the article: “reached out to three parties, no replies and no comment”.

Huh? So how did they confirm?

and “it was only once” is bullshit

They checked and then fired the author. I don’t see how this is “it was only once” implying nothing changed and it will happen again. Isn’t firing the author “holding journalism to a higher standard” already, which you ask for?