

It doesn’t care that you think it’s a bad goal, that’s its goal, you can call it a stupid goal all you want while it kills you.
I’m an anarchocommunist, all states are evil.
Your local herpetology guy.
Feel free to AMA about picking a pet/reptiles in general, I have a lot of recommendations for that!


It doesn’t care that you think it’s a bad goal, that’s its goal, you can call it a stupid goal all you want while it kills you.


We don’t have language for this and even if we did it would be needlessly complex, why bother


“I wasn’t going to have kids but I changed my mind when I got a letter from the government telling me it was time” --nobody


Source? That sounds unbelievable honestly


Do you have the issue trackers?


Matrix, I recommend tuwunel


I want to know how it is determined whether something is a propaganda mill
there’s also this clearly negative one https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3334442/chinas-lgbtq-community-loses-safe-spaces-blued-finka-apps-vanish
how is it known? What evidence is there? I did not have much trouble finding negative articles. What is the basis of this claim?


They wouldn’t put it on the front page, no?
https://www.scmp.com/video/hong-kong/2126479/what-does-it-feel-be-sexual-minority-hong-kong
what about this?
can’t that statement be used to claim any site is a propaganda mill and should be discarded? Couldn’t I do that to throw out the bbc?
edit: also this https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3334442/chinas-lgbtq-community-loses-safe-spaces-blued-finka-apps-vanish


I disagree on the first one, I’ll grant you the second is about north korea, an important ally, but even if they aren’t outright hardline stance negative if I was running a pro china propaganda mill why even acknowledge these things?
even if I feel pressure to acknowledge, why the front page?
there’s this
https://www.scmp.com/video/hong-kong/2126479/what-does-it-feel-be-sexual-minority-hong-kong


https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3342862/hong-kongs-jimmy-lai-faces-sentencing-national-security-trial?module=top_story&pgtype=homepage why is this on the front page?
this too?
seems awfully negative for a propaganda mill, no?
to be clear I don’t know them and you may know something I do not but on first glance that doesn’t seem like what I would expect.


It’s a simulation of a human consciousness, it can be paused and restarted when certain conditions are met.


Then don’t do it that way, put a human consciousness into a machine and wait. They said ever, we can get as sci-fi as we want here


You should try cosmic.


Arch should not be used by beginners and hacking together a distro to make that happen was never a good idea. A team that cannot even figure out SSL certs should not have even attempted it.


Most of it speaks to their lack of competency. Issues like this are less frequent on arch and the whole point of this distro is that It’s supposed to be an easier arch.
it is in fact harder arch.


All of it matters, hard disagree, even if none of them are individually that bad it shows an insane degree of incompetence
the linux mint thing happened one time and was resolved, it shows no history of being incompetent, that’s why it isn’t mentioned, it’s hardly worth mention, one security breach in the entire history of the project is not a big deal.
furthermore i personally don’t think mint is a good distro either so, whatever.


It’s not if it’s done right, android is problematic because it’s not a community project, it’s just a code dump.
case in point, the linux kernel itself
If only there was a solution!