∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]

I do want to thank Archon for this, they have pushed me to complete my copy of SUS () which I had actually gotten far into.

Also sitting there going “Archon should read this.”

Maybe I could if you put some lines breaks (two spaces or a \ at the end of a sentence and then a newline)\
or split the paragraphs (put a blank line in between)

yet, marxism is otherwise the closest historical precedent to any idea like this

Lmao no.

Ok, thanks for telling me.

Also I have said nothing about Rimu. And I know he isn’t the only contributor.

not actually functionally active

What does that mean.

This code exists, but is unused to my knowledge. Certainly for Piefed.social.

wjs018 says it is in use, https://lemmy.ml/post/42044700/23491105 / https://piefed.social/comment/9793872

I hope that piefed will publish the blocked phrases in the api at some point, like lemmy publishes the slur regex in /site. (This isn’t trying to be “look lemmy is better,” I mean this)

No. I can reply to my piefed.social account with the piefed.zip account it has blocked.

So in the context of blocking, if someone blocks you on piefed - you simply can’t reply to them anymore

And maybe it wouldn’t be a problem if we weren’t for federation. The result is a desync, where either all but the instance with the blocker can see the comment, or only the blocked users instance can see the comment.

I did a code review just about a week ago, see https://hexbear.net/comment/6827649 for what I found.

I see you subscribe to the “socialism is when the government does stuff” school of thought, I disagree with that and think Denmark is social democratic and therefore capitalist.

Denmark is capitalist, so yeah of course I’d be legal.

KDE also uses orca.