Edit context: Hasan is calling out right-wingers for getting upset about leftists carrying guns.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    “You want to live in a world without the need for guns, yet you use them when necessary. Curious! I am very intelligent.”

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The fact that they said “leftists” instead of “liberals” made me think they weren’t a right-winger.

    Even liberals call most leftists liberals…

    I got more context from the thread.

  • PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not a big fan of guns. But fuck these losers for having a problem with people displaying their guns. Suck a donkey dick ya pussies.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Reminds me back in the day was browsing a socialist gun subredditt at my brother’s house and my brother was shocked. He said “socialist have guns!”

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have it on good authority that there are far, far more liberals and leftists armed in the USA than anyone can imagine.

      The difference is when you’re not an ammosexual you don’t have to constantly scream and whine and cry about your guns. You just have them and know how to use them and not think about them 24/7.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary”

      ― Karl Marx

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Most leftists don’t think all guns are always bad so I’m not sure what value they’re supposedly turning on here. Pretty sure the prevailing complaint on the left is about how easy it is to acquire a firearm, not that people have them.

    I support people’s right to own weapons but it should be a lot harder to purchase and there should be MUCH greater punishments if the weapon you own is used in a shooting (I’m thinking parents of school shooters who poorly secured their guns)

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      These people don’t understand nuance. If you’re against general unrestricted availability of guns, but are not against all availability of guns, you’ve already lost them, they’ll label you as “anti-gun nut” and then be shocked if you say you own a gun, call you “out” on turning on your own convictions.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In addition to your last sentence, the most stolen item is firearms. If it isn’t secured properly, what happens with it should be on you, even if it’s stolen. If it was secured properly and they still got to it, like breaking open a secure gun safe (not a cheap Walmart one), what happens with it after should not be your fault.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s absolutely what I mean. If your kid takes your gun to school, you did a shit job securing it

    • yum_burnt_toast@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      109
      ·
      24 hours ago

      i dont think that comment is in reference to leftists turning on an antigun stance but right wing media turning on their hardline 2nd amendment stance to vilify them for it

        • hobovision@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It helps to have the context of the views of the speak. Hasanabi is a left guy (I had to double check this).

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I knew Hasan was left but not that the quoted tweet was a conservative reporter complaining about it

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I read that as Hasan questioning the MAGAt if there was any value rightoids won’t forfeit since they are stereotypically very 2A and now this guy’s positing as if owning guns to guard against a tyrannical government is bad.

      If he was trying to criticize leftists or liberals, why’d he choose a right wing source of the news to react to?


      To be fair, I don’t really watch Hasan, so it’s possible my interpretation is completely wrong as clarified in one of his streams.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s how I read it too.

        The thing about reactionaries is that they think rules are for other people. It’s only hypocritical if one takes them at their word, but they only care about winning points in arguments. They’ll argue any position if they can twist it into sounding reasonable, and they’ll steal the language of liberation from the left to do so.

        Their singular principle is that entrenched power must defend itself, because they know benefits them directly. They sincerely don’t care about the second amendment; they don’t think it applies to everyone, only “real” Americans who look and act like white supremacists.

    • tino_408@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      How could you make it harder? Imagine if it was hard for all the new gun owners in Minnesota? I’m guessing you just want to make the rules?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        In my opinion, there should be mandatory training and testing to check that you know how to store and operate your firearm properly. You should also be required to own a secure place to store it.

        The training and testing should be paid for by taxes though (at least the first time) so poor people aren’t restricted from gun ownership.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Basically, though I believe that does not require you to be certified for the gun you’re purchasing. It just requires general knowledge. I think it should go further.

            Also, that is not a federal requirement to purchase a firearm. It’s only required in some jurisdictions.

            Ideally, it should also require fairly frequent practice. This rule would be hard to enforce though.

            • tino_408@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              50 minutes ago

              All guns work the same. Only different is the action (how to load the gun) and there are only a few subcategories. How other people vote and decide to run there town is out of our hands. This idea that guns are hard to use is quite the contrary they are designed for anybody to use that’s why they are so deadly. Less then 1% of legal gun owners do a crime with there legally owned guns. USA doesn’t have a gun issue we have a criminal and mental health issue. Criminals do not follow any guns laws causing regular citizens to be outgunned. And we should ask ourselves what is going on in society that is causing people to shoot themselves? But you’re proving my point you just want the rules to be your way. How each state and country decide there laws is what true democracy stands for.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I’m obviously talking about states with weak gun laws, not the people in the photo. Minnesota’s firearm regulations are fine.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Why do people think that’s a leftist?

    Sounds like every single american who sees masked guys in their neighborhood and hasn’t turned on the news in a couple years.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The Second Amendment is meant for SHOOTING SCHOOLS and TODDLERS SHOOTING PARENTS NOT Protecting your Neighborhoods!

  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’re not a hypocrite for following the current law and also wanting to change the same law.

    One opinion is about what an individual’s best choice is, given the situation.

    The other is about what laws would be best for a society to have.

    What’s best for an individual is not always the same as what’s best for a group or society.

    • dogbert@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Real leftism has always been pro-gun. This liberal anti-gun nonsense is childish.

      • Master@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Its not childish. In fact the Democrat leaders that push for it are the same ones trying to betray the american people at every turn. Which makes it a Republican Tactic to keep Democrat voters defenSeless and further more to make them think it is their own idea to be defenseless.

        Its a wild and crazy mentality to have, I know, and yet here we are in a world where Republicans dont want Democrats to have protection from them and Democrats also dont want Democrats to have protections from Republicans.

        • lolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The state should not have the power to brutalize its own people. They should not have a monopoly on violence. Never again.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          To add to this, political speech (much like online discourse) benefits from flattening.

          Nuance (I enjoy guns and am pro-gun but I think there should be controls in place to make it more difficult for people who are likely to kill to obtain them) is harder to argue against and harder to make stick in people’s minds.

    • almost1337@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      The problem that we frequently run into is people who only want what’s best for them at the cost of society, while still wanting full benefits of being a member of said society.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “Oh my god! You hypocrite! You are not supposed to fight back! You have morals remember?!?”

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      A friend just messaged me that Mississippi jumped from 50th to 8th in reading comprehension, not because they suddenly did better, but because everyone else did so much worse.

      This thread confirms that.

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 hours ago

    It’s not even turning in the value. If you talk to most leftist they acknowledge fire arms shouldn’t be banned out right. There should just me more control so every raving lunatic who wants one can’t.

    • ThunderQueen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      This is about the way the right wingers are reacting to leftists taking up arms in the face of tyranny. Not the leftists themselves.