• Noodle07@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I should download classic wow servers game and addons for long term storage in case of WW3 🤔 and wikipedia too

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    So, I setup meshtastic.

    Put an antenna on my roof.

    Have a decent number of mesh radios. Put one in each car in relay mode.

    Setup a locally run LLM and made an interface to it.

    Working on setting up a BBS.

    I’m in the high density suburbs, I can, when the weather is just right, reach a single node that doesn’t seem to be able to reach any other nodes.

    If I go on a drive, I can see 5-10 nodes.

    Adoption in the mid-Atlantic US is just so damn low, it’s not really usable.

    We need some antennas up high, but there aren’t any reasonable options around me.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There are 4 in my metropolitan area, and I don’t have line of sight to any of them :(

        There are about 30 meshtastic in the same area, but most of them are out of range to each other.

        I even stood one up at work on the other side of town and mqtt’d them together.

        edit: a’ight I put it on a t114. can’t see anything from the house, track practice is 25mi away, lets see if there are any quiet core nodes out there.

        edit: edit: Nothing at all. Which is a fing shame, the client is way nicer, it’s better on battery. It’s better on battery on the t114. The map is faster. I think it’s probably a better product since you can kind of emulate the client/router setup and it can work like meshtastic. Maybe I’ll leave my of my v3’s running on it in the attic with a modest antenna upgrade.

  • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    How resilient is something like Meshtastic? My understanding is that anyone can configure their device poorly so that it can become overly chatty, congesting the network. Even in ideal an ideal scenario with properly configured nodes, could this actually survive if it saw more than hobbiest adoption?

    I think it’s really cool and i like having this idea of a backup communication system, but if has serious range limitations and is likely to be overwhelmed in a no-cell scenario is it even worth it, or is it just fun to play around with?

    • fastether@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      By default it implements rough limits that you cannot exceed to make sure that you do not not transmit too much noise. Additionally, you can always establish private channels for your nodes and / or not retransmit at all.

      Meshtastic isn’t intended for mission-critical uses or as an internet substitute. It is intended for very basic text based communication (e.g. between your friends) or remote IoT devices.

      The congestion argument also applies to all radio based communication, there are always people transmitting with high gain, noisy outputs or spam.

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I understand the limitations of the frequency and the compromises mesh networks have to make. I wouldn’t expect it to be an internet substitute. My point is, and I do apologise because I cannot remember the source, I recall hearing about a convention or a protest or some larger gathering where people tried to use Meshtastic and it cratered due to load.

        If that above case actually did happen and I’m not mis-remembering, then it doesn’t bode well for adoption by the non-tech savvy. You get into this odd area where you have tech and RF hobbiests that think this is cool beans, but they don’t make up enough people for a robust network. However the more people you bring on that don’t understand radio settings the more succeptible you are to poor performance. Then if it ever does it mass adoption it is likely oitside the abilities of the tech and scale just isn’t possible. You need this sweet spot.

        With ham or something else you can have a few people in more remote locations because of superior range, but with low powered RF like Meshtastic you really want portable devices for people on the ground. All this is to say I love the idea of being able to give something like this to a loved one going to a protest or something, but I’m just not sure if it’s more than a toy yet.

        I’m not sure what they could do to keep this open while ensuring stability unless they start to add dynamic settings to tje protocol. Something that detects if there’s too much congestion, or if signals are too strong to automatically switch from LongFast to something more applicable to a the dense group you’re in. Then manual settings get hidden behind an advanced menu? But that would be entirely on tje firmware to control.

        Anyway, I’m rambling and trying to solution without actually owning one, so I could be way off. I just really like the idea of short range personal communication and want this to be more than a tinker tech.

        • fastether@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          In Switzerland, we already switched to MediumFast due to congestion in cities. It was a coordinated change and real world tests showed no significant worse mesh performance for most nodes. Meshtastic is evolving fast and I think it does become more and more viable as an off-grid or doomsday communication. It also is hard to censor which could be useful for journalism and free speech. Hence, not a substitute for the internet, but a more and more viable solution for many.

          Can’t speak about any mass gatherings or protests, but haven’t had any issues so far with mine. Even in big cities, air util and ch util is below 35% so there is a lot more space available.

  • BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    People who actually have to work and get the bread of the day are not spending money on that. IMHO. Sorry if I sound rude but honestly unless you want to experiment with something that hardly will have any real impact in real life you are just wasting money.

    To use these kind of devices you need at least two people using it.

    Anyway I guess people spend their money on whatever they want.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Meshtatic radios are very cheap, about $20. It’s one of their main drivers of their popularity.

      To use these kind of devices you need at least two people using it.

      🤣🤣🤣 A communications device that requires a receiver and a sender??? Oh, how useless!

      There’s over 300 meshtastic radios in my area.

      • BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        My point is, you need two devices and ALSO the knowledge to set up these devices, it was implicit in the comment, some “normal” people even need support to setup WhatsApp do you really think they will use that kind of stuff? $20 is not a lot of money but there are people who can’t afford it anyway. Unless you live in an overpopulated area it will be pretty hard to find someone else using that kind of device, it’s just another hobby like VHF/UHF and CB.

        Meshtastic it’s just coping it don’t have a real application and supposing someone make a business and start deploying the system for money the kind of people who are into it will say “greedy fuckers”