That’s because sites have stopped indexing their own info, because of Google.
Also, I’ve toyed with the idea of creating product categorization with a Dewey knock off. I’d be happy to catalog your site, if you did.
That’s because sites have stopped indexing their own info, because of Google.
Also, I’ve toyed with the idea of creating product categorization with a Dewey knock off. I’d be happy to catalog your site, if you did.
deleted by creator


The NIH has similar findings.


I’ve been wondering why society seemed to be getting dumber.


And inherited by your children.
The ultimate assassin.
I just need to build out the system in a logical manner.
Wikipedia would be inf.ref.enc. Webster and Urban Dictionary? inf.ref.dic.
Standard library locations.
As far as the university goes, the system’s incomplete.
A library has books on several universities, but the book can only be in one place.


When they first started, they had a list of promises. One of them was to always fit on a 800meg CD.


When they first started, they had a list of promises. One of them was to always fit on a 800meg CD.


When they first started, they had a list of promises. One of them was to always fit on a 800meg CD.


When they first started, they had a list of promises. One of them was to always fit on a 800meg CD.
The site would have a very Google-esque feel. The listings would look similar.
That’s the plan. Moderators for categories.
Pretty much.
It also doesn’t catalog individual pages. It lists domains and their descriptions.


That’s because I don’t want that.
I remember, as a kid, wandering the local library. Looking at all the books. Seeing the call numbers and author names. Exploring the shelves, as they transitioned from topic to topic to topic.
My idea is to treat the Internet as a giant library, with domains being books on a shelf, and allowing my users to start at a random location, and then peruse the different listings as they transition from slight variations of the main topic.
With all due respect, you don’t have the vision, man. To start looking at cultural anthropology, then have a link to a biological anthropology blog 3 lines down? That’s the goal. It’s not about a narrowed search. It’s about cataloging something, so people can go looking for it. To enjoy the hunt.


Thank you 🙏️


You’re right about knowing your audience. That’s when I do my best work.
You literally have to know what thought is going to pop into their heads before they do. Then, you kind of steer the conversation like a tour guide in a car. Your goal isn’t to be right, but to give them the best experience. And, the best experience is having a reason to live in a world without their fantasy. For most people, fantasy is the only thing they have left – especially in this world. And crushing that without giving them something equally sustainable (for their mental state) makes one an asshole. It isn’t that you can’t convince a lot of people. It’s that you have to crush them to do it sometimes.
Great point on knowing when to stop as well.


I forced Ben Shapiro to change his views on gender with well-thought-out counterpoints.
He was literally saying sex and gender were the same. After a spelled out comment on why they weren’t, he changed his tune on the next show.
The left.
And I hate to say that.
First of all, AI runs on the Theory of Evolution. It evolves processes to accomplish a desired outcome.
It didn’t cheat. It did what it was supposed to do: win.
We set up a situation where it could cheat, told it to win, then got angry with it, because we didn’t restrain it properly.