Why would it stifle innovation? Does innovation only spring from maximum potential profit?

Also you know Socrates was ultimately killed for his continuous insistence on not understanding anything, and just asking questions.

Whats does that have to do with this conversation?

Why would companies not use automation because of taxes? Why would they use less when they still make more profit, even with taxation?

Lets forget the Sagan standard then and go the Socrates route.

Why is it so obviously true?

Those are some extraordinary claims…

That will make Finland noncompetitive, increase prices making everybody poorer and increasing unemployment even more.

This seems like guesswork.

Tax the rich, and invest in infrastructure, education and healthcare, to ensure Finland stays a high quality society, with high innovation, and highly qualified workers.

Why does that have to be mutually exclusive? ¿Por qué no los dos? Taxing automation is just one way to tax the rich. Who has more automation: Tesla or a small family owned shop?

Tax automation so the country can afford to have that unemployment.

I didn’t know epic games developed that.

Yup, and I like it.

It changed a lot over time, but the main thing was photographer. The one thing I knew, that I never wanted to do, was to be a teacher.

Guess what I do…

Bet you’re also sick of hearing people say, that amercans are just letting them be fascists.

But people have to realize how big america is. It was easy back in the old days, when there were cars and aeroplanes. And yeah, maybe jan 6 happened with a small amount of people, but it’s not like any of them were willing to risk their life or anything, or got close to overthrowing the government.

I have heard people try to explain why they log in on porn sites: It saves your favorite videos, it recommends new videos and it makes it possible to see paid content.

All three things are reasons why I don’t want to log in. Yeah, like I want a list of my perversions attached to my name.