A seven year old iPhone I got very cheap.

I hope by “CDs” you mean CDs bought directly from the artists.

It mattered to Musk that there are Black communities to fuck with, so why not mention that.

That’s not what they meant when they said that AIs can be a powerful tool for doctors.

I guess not, but he also didn’t start talking semantics. Also, bad teeth have usually financial reasons if dental care isn’t part of the healthcare package.

A few federal traits does not make a federation. My federal government in Berlin impacts me on a daily basis, and it may overrule state or communal governments. My state shares a common constitution with the other states and leaves a bunch of tasks completely on a federal level; they could not function on their own.

The institutions in Brussels on the other hand do not impact me much, mostly because they relate to specific areas like trade or environment. Member states retain a very high degree of sovereignty, so much that the EU constitutes a unique, supranational construct. Non-members like Switzerland or Norway can productively co-exist with treaties, a bureaucratic hurdle the UK has to face now, too.

This blimey limey has been told by rat catchers that Brussels has far more power than it really has. I mean we weren’t allowed to call jam products marmelade because of the brits (this has been reversed yay). That’s the level of impact for the average Joe and Jane.

But you obviously don’t understand what a federation is (hint: the EU ain’t one).

I think tropical fruits are one of these goods we really shouldn’t burn oil in container ships for.

deleted by creator

The authors of the article you linked, are you a bot or something? If not, touch some grass.

Maybe don’t be a dick in traffic?

The exact opposite: that sources need to be cited so they can be validated independently.

This article doesn’t explain how citing sources is unnecessary.

How exactly do you prove that sources aren’t necessary? Maybe you should take a break from moderating once in a while if you really believe that.

I don’t.

Quoting a source is done if you don’t want to take personal responsibility to state something as a fact.

Take a step back from your passion topic here and say that about any other journalistic or scientific piece and you‘ll see what absolute bullshit that statement is. A reputable medium has and should not have any problem citing sources (I‘m not judging the medium here by that, might have been a simple mistake, there seem to be a lot of freelance authors).

According to automatically translated titles in search results (auto subs in video is broken for me), this is the source: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/reMYxWBELxM

The reporting outlets should reference this, this is bad style and opens up opportunity to flag these stories as falsified anecdotes by propagandists.

What? The article reads like the author talk to Bahaa in person, but this isn’t clearly stated as it is common with first person accounts. So i wondered who actually talk to him.

Did the author spoke with Bahaa directly, or what is the primary source on this?