Yea, audio is a rabbit hole! And agreed, probably announced soon.

Those seem to have gone the way of the dodo.

Ayy, thanks for the confirmation! I really want it but it’s likely going to be expensive, even if it does come to the US…

Fairly certain, haven’t seen full confirmation yet but the chipset supports it, along with GOS’ confirmation that it isn’t a foldable a while back. Unless Motorola has an entirely new SKU for GOS this seems like it.

I gave you a source already, and the purpose of developing the productive forces rapidly is to reach the level at which exploitation is economically unfeasible, when there will not be an antagonistic contradiction between social ownership and decentralized production. I don’t know what your point is.

I genuinely do not get your point. The purpose of developing rapidly is to uplift the proletariat rapidly and achieve communism faster.

A century of COINTELPRO and NSPM-7 style tactics. The left stands to change the world, the right stands to entrench it.

Marxism is not a moral philosophy. The purpose of rapidly developing is to develop into the conditions where there will not be antagonistic contradictions between socialized ownership and the level of development of the productive forces. The base of marketization is in highly decentralized production, the base of socialized ownership is in highly centralized and developed productive forces. The proletariat of China has consistently been uplifted decade after decade.

Further, unequal exchange is generally about international trade, not internal trade.

China isn’t capitalist, what’s the point of sharing documents on unequal exchange and expecting a ban? China is exploited by the west to a decent degree, but they are developing rapidly and undermine that very system.

Gotta do what you gotta do!

It’s the Signature 27 I believe. Still expensive, just not a foldable.

Nah, it’s a slab phone.

The prolewiki page on unequal exchange is a good primer. China itself is harmed by unequal exchange, because it’s primarily something higher wage countries benefit from.

Tons! Any specific area? How familiar are you with Marxism?

Yea I know it was a joke, haha. Just wanted to respond earnestly.

I’m sure, haha.

Public ownership is the principal aspect of the economy, and workers control the state. Other comrades have explained in much better detail, but this is a simplified version.

China doesn’t contribute to unequal exchange, it bypasses it. Jason Hickel, one of the people mentioned in your first article, is enormously supportive of China. I think you need to revisit unequal exchange and how it functions. Your second video is from a member of the “New Nationalists of America,” and further still you didn’t respond to any of the claims.

I do share when I can, but usually I just send links to online resources and books as that’s typically easier for most people.

Depends on who was going through my stuff!