But I’m very afraid of exposing the server to the internet and it being hacked or such.

I see this sentiment a lot… and I don’t get it.

Your server is going to be secure almost by default. Add the firewall and only open the ports you actually serve, and the majority of your work is done.

But if you follow a decent hardening guide you’ll find many of those other little ways people can exploit the services you do leave open, and you’ll lock those down too.

Then at that point, you have dealt with 99.99% of the script kiddie / bot threats that will ever find you.

What is the source of the fear when regular Joe’s discounts themselves and say no I won’t expose my hardware? You know the cloud is just someone else’s computer, right?

I’ve been self hosting a publicly exposed domain which serves http, mail, etc for literally more than a decade. My logs are filled with background noise but my stuff is fine.

No tail scale, no cloud flare, my cloud is mine

Moral of my story - Don’t be scared, try to be smart and keep your stuff updated via automation

Paulaner’s “Maß” just got even bigger and is available to go

Right? The real irony is that those who are paid to enforce the law, and who’re sworn to uphold it, feel they’re above it - beyond reproach.

The system is sick with apathy and outright corruption.

We must save ourselves

… And we still didn’t care

Then they came for the cat videos …

I hate the way this is getting it twisted.

Just because your signal is misinterpreted does not mean you’ve waived your rights. It means their system and it’s use of citizen’s data is flawed and violates the law.

Yes exactly. She more than most had an opportunity to say no, and didn’t

We’re all born bald, baby

Have you guys heard about the player’s club card?