They are quite available.

You could buy, in the next five minutes, three different styles of baggy pants in three sizes each. They’d be at your front door in a couple of days. You could try them on, test out the fit and pockets, and return the ones you don’t like.

If you live in a big city or near a shopping mall, you could walk into a store and buy some big ol’ pants within the hour.

If by “less available” you mean there are more SKUs offered or shelving space dedicated to “traditional” women’s pants, then yeah I’ll agree with you there. But it’s 2026, you don’t even need brick and mortar, and you can just order whatever you want.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=baggy+womens+jeans+with+deep+pockets&iar=shopping&t=fpas

Anybody can buy baggy pants with pockets. From shein to Levi’s to designer.

My issue is with men. Specifically chronically online white knights and their ironically misogynistic stances. My issue is not with women.

When your headline is a question, the answer is “no.”

You said yourself “capitalism will do what capitalism does” or words to that effect. So if more women wanted looser clothing, why would companies not start selling it?

The answer is that they have. Do just one Google search for “baggy women’s jeans with pockets” and you’ll see that they’re readily available.

Yes, and that’s because it’s what most women want to buy. How is that hard to understand?

Si verdad.

My point is that “men complain about women’s clothing” not “women complain about women’s clothing.” They white knight so hard they don’t realize that the choice exists, then they go to “well they feel pressured to wear those things because of societal expectations.” They are just trying so hard to take the agency away from women one way or another.

Loose fitting women’s clothing is not hard to find. It’s in brick and mortar stores. It’s online. My wife wears it. Kids wear it, loose clothing is very fashionable right now.

When you say “not as available” what does that mean? That less of it is sold? That’s because it’s what sells. Most women want form-fitting clothing with smaller pockets.

YouTube Premium. You will never get me to say that it is not the best deal in streaming.

Honestly. It’s not hard to know both.

If you want a real hoot, next time the issue comes up point out that women’s clothing is the way it is (form-fitting, small pockets, etc.) because that’s what the majority of women buy and that there are a lot of looser options with big pockets out there.

Edit: I’m talking about men’s opinions on women’s clothing. Women are well aware of their clothing choices.

EU about to become Eurovision 2.0

Favorite or least favorite? Because I will go to bat for Alton and Alec.

You can go on YouTube and watch a cat eat a whole rabbit.

They sure can. In practice there is a very real risk from poison the mouse may have ingested or parasites it may carry, and certainly the cat’s tummy could get upset if it isn’t used to that kind of food (lord knows even a new kind of cat food can make some cats puke).

But in theory cats can eat mice just fine, bones and all.

Source

It’s just a thought experiment. I would never feed my cats raw mice but I got to thinking about the question.

I just put that shit on the couch right next to me.

deleted by creator

Loanwords are a thing in every language, especially English loanwords.

I’m excited as hell.

I love Ocarina of Time with all my heart, but it hasn’t aged well like most games of its era. I can’t wait to re-experience it with modern controls and quality of life.

Additionally I’m more excited that it’s a faithful remake vs a reimagining. I’ve wanted an updated version of OoT for a long time, and the 3D versions never scratched that itch for me.

Is there something in particular you’re looking for?