• PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        School is suppose to teach you how to critically think and learn. The material is mostly there to prove you have the ability to do it.

        • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          In an ideal world, sure. School, largely, hasn’t taught that in a long time. That’s not how the incentive structures work. School is incentivized by grades, grades don’t go up with learning, teaching is hard, memorizing and regurgitating? That’s much easier. Tests have been changed to reflect that.

          Unless, you’re not American that is. I wouldn’t have any experience with a somewhat functional education system.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Yeah, it’s because it’s not the school that is bullshit.

          It’s some of the stuff people do there. At the same time, some aren’t. And we are incredibly bad at telling the difference, and worse than useless on doing that at scale.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Which I think just illustrates that take-home essays aren’t a great way to do things now, if they ever were.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I mean, graded take home essays are a waste. It’s like assigning weight training. Good for exercising, and we can talk about your form when you’re done.

        But as soon as you start stack ranking the results, the incentive to cheat outpaces the goal of practicing ingesting and outputing ideas.