• Sabrinamycarpet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re trying to explain by ignoring my question regarding your source not once but twice.

      And also conveniently ignoring the actual point being made and instead focusing on whether or not its 75% or 85% or what is an algorithm

      And also dismissing arguments because its morally beneath you.

        • Sabrinamycarpet@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You sure are doing a great job helping people understand when you, for the third time, refuse to answer the question about where your source refers to accuracy. You haven’t provided jack.

          You sure also sound quite prideful to the fact that this is just about me and my preferences, that you can’t see this is actually how most people view the world.

          Tell me, actually answer me here instead of deflecting: Do you really think the world is just stupid? They all use google or Gmail or YouTube or Facebook and dont realize their data is being collected? You think if you just help educate them they will all realize and stop using these services?

          No worries though, you won’t need to be intentionally obtuse for longer, outsourcing your thought processes to Google will do that for you, and for free.

          I have no worries here. I’m not the one that’s going to fall behind while screaming at the clouds as tech keeps rolling along.