• Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Jesus, someone replace Jensen with an AI already. The bots could generate much more nuanced and empathetic responses. /SARCASM

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe if the majority agrees on something, you should pay attention instead of doubling down. We know this tech is to put us all broke and give your class of rich fucks the best life at our expense.

    Eat the rich.

  • nostrauxendar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Man whose finances are reliant on scheme really wishes you’d all stop talking about downsides of scheme, more at 11

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seems like a standard that isn’t possible to meet. If there was a reliable way to detect bots we wouldn’t be in this situation where bots dominate social media.

        I can tell you that the bot tactic of promoting outrage and vitriol is well known and the topic of AI has some of the most toxic people participating. Always bringing insults, fallacy laden ‘arguments’ and downvote spamming.

        That doesn’t happen on other topics where people disagree, even in this community.

        We know bots are a big problem on social media. We know the tactics that they use, they infiltrate both extremes and use those positions to sow division and anger and, in my experience, this is the topic that receives the most comments fitting that tactic.