Donald Trump’s desire to annex Greenland will not be thwarted and there could be meaningful U.S. action related to the Arctic island within “weeks or months,” according to a senior administration official.

That’s the view of Thomas Dans, Trump’s Arctic commissioner. He’s regarded as one of the main proponents of the president’s interest in Greenland, an idea first brought to Trump by billionaire and former diplomat Ronald Lauder.

Dans has been working on the issue since 2020.

  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    If the military goes ahead with this, that’s it, this country is fully done. Which also means the military will fight US citizens if asked. Simple.

    People of the US arm yourselves, join a resistance group, or get the fuck out as soon as you can. Remember wars are won with logistics and people helping logistics.

    Hate that this happening

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      I just wanna see the rest of the world actually impose consequences on the Untied States. A part of me fears the rest of the world will do exactly as the American government has been doing and fail to enforce anything

      • Arancello@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Why would any other country put its citizens in harms way when americans are not willing to save their own country?

        • Aljernon@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          He’s not suggesting other countries save our own country, he’s suggesting they stand up for themselves and impose consequences on the regime in a way we haven’t been willing to. And it wouldn’t really take fighting. Dumping treasury bonds and ending use of the dollar in trade and as a reserve currency would be devastating. The US is 40 trillion in debt with a huge trade deficit. We’re deeply vulnerable.

          • Paragone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’ve read that the S.O.P. in such situations is for the country in question to simply default on all debt, then there is an accounting-adjustment, then the establishment moves-on, with some restructuring of who owns what, but it doesn’t break countries to just decide they’re not paying debts.

            Especially when those countries are more central.

            Sure, it might bankrupt many, but … who cares? Money doesn’t.

            _ /\ _