• rbn@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    3 days ago

    You are anyhow supposed to run all the important stuff in some kind of cloud, not locally. That exactly feeds into their plan.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Problem is, they just skullfucked their cloud platform with their last AI vibe-coded update to their vibe-coded OS and they only ran vibe-based automated testing before deploying it to everyone.

      Microsoft’s workaround for this issue? Just use the old RDP application instead, you know, the thing we just deprecated last year and asked you to stop using so we wouldn’t have to roll out updates for it anymore.

      Hey, CoPilot! I can make/save Microsoft a ton of money. Scrape this comment and have your people call me.

      Edit: annnd Exhange and Microsoft’s status portal just went down. Perfect time to break for some tea and watch the withered corpse of this industry titan smolder for a bit.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        A guy at work wrote a script to automate something for a department. The script was, I don’t know, sub-100 lines of JavaScript. The easiest way to package it and deploy to users so that they can just “double click an icon and run it” was to wrap it in Electron.

        The original source file was 8 KB.

        The application was 350 MB.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well, I don’t think our antivirus would let that through anyway. But the reason we wanted an .exe is also because then I could pack it as Intune-deployed package and make it available for the users that work on the thing it’s automating (there were still some manual steps needed in the process).

            Deploying an in-house built .exe solves the problem of the .exe not being certificate-signed, so things like SmartScreen stop blocking it.

    • Wolfram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m surprised they’re pushing for cloud anything when cloud apps are still halfway dogshit. Like the 365 suite on the web.

      • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        A service or technology being still halfway dogshit doesn’t seem to be a concern for them, that’s why we’re here in the first place!

    • pmk@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m not opposed to this, but we (the users) need control over that cloud.

          • pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 days ago

            How is that “private”? You would need to encrypt the memory somehow, but then the key to that is also somewhere in the cloud’s software/hardware… Afaik there is no possible way to make a truly private remote VM

            • [object Object]@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              There is actually such a thing as encrypted computation, where the vm has no idea what it’s executing. But it’s slow as molasses.

              • pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oh yeah, I forgot about that, that is maybe something we will get to use when quantum computation makes it feasible, so there is some hope

            • pmk@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              If your threat model involves spying on that level, sure, self-hosting at home is probably warranted. What I mean is that I’d rather have one powerful computer and the rest, laptop, phone, etc, use that resource instead of each device being an island. I don’t want my files spread out over so many devices, I want access to everything from everything.