• pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      How is that “private”? You would need to encrypt the memory somehow, but then the key to that is also somewhere in the cloud’s software/hardware… Afaik there is no possible way to make a truly private remote VM

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        There is actually such a thing as encrypted computation, where the vm has no idea what it’s executing. But it’s slow as molasses.

        • pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh yeah, I forgot about that, that is maybe something we will get to use when quantum computation makes it feasible, so there is some hope

      • pmk@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        If your threat model involves spying on that level, sure, self-hosting at home is probably warranted. What I mean is that I’d rather have one powerful computer and the rest, laptop, phone, etc, use that resource instead of each device being an island. I don’t want my files spread out over so many devices, I want access to everything from everything.