Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Ah… I think I see your problem now. You think nothing can happen unless the bourgeois will it. I, frankly, don’t agree with that. I think you think the world is a lot more chess-like when it’s really a lot more like poker with mostly idiots. That does explain why MLs want to go authoritarian to fix the problems, though.

Anyway, the reason why you’re a fucking biscuit is you don’t seem to be expressing ideas to convert liberals to your cause. You have written them off as unfixable, and, well, that sort of gives you fewer allies. How silly.

But that’s the thing. That isn’t the primary task. That’s your primary task. Some people just need to get out of their struggle before they can help others. And if you think that will create more enemies than allies to you, then… I think you are grossly misinformed or you are lying about what you actually want.

Like, you might as well say we shouldn’t have freed the slaves unless we destroyed the institutions that created slavery. Incremental progress is still good, even if it’s not preferred, and people’s lives benefit from it.

Is anybody an ally of you if they have other goals that are not yours???

So deep. Much thought. Philosopher. Wow.

Truly, you also participate in society, you fucking donut.

You got a lot of people attacking you for saying this that are oddly defensive of billionaires and their “right” to purchase young women, sex, or anything else they want.

But Bill Gates did make a generous donation in Epstein’s name only a couple hours after this draft, so, you know, definitely not conclusive.

In a perfectly balanced, evenly powered world where everyone had adequate housing, food, and all the necessities of life, transactional sex is fine. Because no one’s life depends on it. There is no power imbalance, no coersion.

But we don’t live in that world. Billionaires can and often do make your life a living hell if they don’t get what they want from you. And people, generally, do not have all the necessities of life. 99+% of them require money to live. And these women are no exception. Heck, this doesn’t apply to even just billionaires or men. Sex workers NEED that money to live, so it is inherently exploitative.

That is the problem, like it or not. But billionaires only compound the issue multiple times over, because they can also apply power greater than others. And they can stop being a billionaire at any point.

Juvenile? Okay. Now fuck off.

I mean, I think they got it right or you would’ve said otherwise.

The government does not operate in a vacuum. Corporations and their owners support these policies and actions, which is why economic boycotts are part of the strike.

I suppose the any other questions bit was unnecessary, but I was trying to point out that it was listed in the post in a rather humorous way. I apologize because it does sound a bit snarkier than intended. Sorry.

Your business does not create money from nowhere. You buy things, and you sell things. You are part of a bigger economy, and you are striking that.

You close down for the day and don’t buy anything. It’s quite clearly spelled out: No work. No school. No shopping.

Any other questions?