I had it cite a case which didn’t exist. It was perfect for what I was fighting (it tends to figure out what you want to hear then makes up stuff to satisfy you).

When I tried to search for a phrase from the case (hoping it just gave the wrong citation) it said there was no such case with that phrase.

I asked why it said there was such a case earlier. It confessed that AI sometimes hallucinates and promised to try better in future.

[edit: sorry I ended up on a tangent]

Lawyers are no guarantee. They are sloppy because they have no skin in the game, and they usually get paid regardless (although some have “uplift” fees which reward them for winning).

It is like hiring builders for your renovation. You still have to keep an eye on them and even tell them how to do their job, which of course is always a tense situation. If you develop a good relationship you can work as a team (requires a lawyer who is not insecure).

Best avoid situations which need a lawyer. Do not litigate lightly. There is no such thing as a watertight case. If you get a corrupt judge they can outright lie, there is no point appealing, and you can be gagged from telling anyone (even your wife, let alone a politician or journalist).

In Australia digital ID is not mandatory (though the government tried to make it so).

We were the first with these adult filters.

I don’t know if a system similar to Germany was proposed but there is a security problem with having all our data collated on a government server.

It is all bloated to track us and direct market to us. We have to upgrade hardware which is otherwise adequate just to assist their surveillance of us.

I am sure their algorithm will do the arithmetic.

You think denial of health care compares with denial of access to adult content?

KLAN

How would they be controlled though?

Indeed “thousands of km” is far fetched:

some of which are expected to be sent thousands of kilometers away while others remain in Moscow for further trials.

Upon reflection, I agree it is probably just propaganda. Should I leave the post up though?

The top comment here is making valid points casting doubt on its veracity. Isn’t that a good thing?

Nobody ever has AFAIK.

Was this “poorly redacted” thing just a hoax from the outset? Perhaps even started by MAGA HQ to get us too exhausted by false and innocuous findings so that when the real paydirt hits the screens the swinging voters will be too jaded to care?

deleted by creator

I don’t know how one would mask it Maybe the crowd is totally overdubbed. I cannot find phone recordings. Are all phone uploads of the event being rejected by YouTube?

Yes but if the presenters didn’t mention it, I could not detect boos from the video alone.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/iZRAa4fKZ3U

I have noticed this often when someone gets booed. Pretty obvious when you are there but not on video. As an audio nerd it has me perplexed.

https://youtu.be/DCto6UkBJoI

Cued… https://youtu.be/DCto6UkBJoI&t=12m37s

https://youtu.be/d-YcVLq98Ew&t=8m24s

Doesn’t say why a vacuum cannot conduct heat though, but it makes sense to me now anyhow. Heat is vibrating molecules so to mitigate the vibration you need adjacent molecules which aren’t vibrating as much.

Fascinating. Will look more into it to understand.

Thanks

No cooling capacity? Isn’t it the extreme opposite?