The problem is that it won’t. We essentially already have the best case scenario, which is that ai slop is non-copyrightable, meaning that if disney for example tries to generate a slop movie, everyone is free to distribute it so you can’t really make any money off of it. Extending copyright pretty much always ends up benefitting corporations, not hurting them.
Jack Riddle[Any/All]
Profile picture drawn by Paws and Claws and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike 4.0 International license(cc-by-sa 4.0)
- 0 Posts
- 2 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
Cake day: May 1st, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
I looked it up and unfortunately the ruling is a lot weaker than I initially thought. An artwork generated solely by ai cannot be copyrighted, however, there can be copyright on ai-generated works with a human author(?)¹
¹https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/19/ai-art-cannot-be-copyrighted-appeals-court-rules.html