The perspective of coining the denying of the right to return of refugees as a crime against humanity is interesting, a good argument that can and should be pushed. But if it’s presented as a legal fact rather than a good theory that should be tested, like the news articles say, I would have blocked that report myself and forced the authors to correct it. It’s a report, it can absolutely be critical about the law and it’s interpretation as of today, and advocate for an evolution of it through a meaningfull legal argument, but it shouldn’t present audacious legal theories as totally grounded legal rules ; that’s a job for the legal action team, not the Independent experts, and I understand how the NGO’s credibility could be at stakes here.

I’d like to have the report to really make my own mind on it.

he never said that this is a bad thing that needs to change ;)