alaphic

plus more.

Like… what? You can’t just say that like that and then not at least characterize the ‘more’ in some fashion…

Maybe the internet truly is… No Country for Old Men…

… The Aristocrats!

(If anyone gets this reference I’ll be what scientists are calling “fucking surprised”)

And only… checks calendar what, like 5 - 7 years after they were a thing? Great work guys, way to stay ahead of things

I live in this state.

These same folks can’t seem to figure out why we’ve had an ever worsening teacher shortage for the last couple of decades or so, btw. (Spoiler alert: It may not solely be due to the fact that everyone who can gets the fuck out of here as soon as humanly possible 🤯)

Also i dislike the implications and at what directions fun is beeing made.

… I’m sorry, but what in the actual incoherence is that even supposed to mean?

¿Por que no los dos?

I suppose you could theoretically utilize the flash functionality in an attempt to catch some sort of glare/reflection back from the hidden camera’s lens… maybe? This is just a guess, however, tbh, and I have my doubts of its efficacy against the borderline frighteningly tiny lenses in use on more modern equipment that is designed specifically to be hidden. The pricier gear could (potentially) even utilize special coatings or treatments intended to mitigate such a detection method for that matter, as there’s clearly no shortage of money surrounding the… “industry,” for lack of a better term.

I certainly wouldn’t consider it a reliable test, that’s for sure

If so, that only makes your comment all the more puzzling, honestly

Are you familiar with the term ‘tongue in cheek’? Or ‘hyperbole’? Cuz - I’m just sayin- I really doubt that even the yellow-est of rags would expect people to believe that we’re only a “bite my shiny metal ass” away from triggering a T2 style ‘Judgement Day’… I’d say it’s simply far more likely they were simply being facetious.

Now if it was NewsMax, on the other hand…

Not that I don’t support the spirit of it or anything, but we literally estapo’ hold down, disarm, and then summarily execute one of our brothers for having the audacity to try to help a woman they had thrown to the ground for no reason… If you think your attempts at ‘un-arresting’ anyone would be met with anything other than a hail of bullets courtesy of a group of Call of Duty cosplaying, white supremacist pussies who are simultaneously frothing at the mouth and jizzing their fucking pants at the thought of having an excuse to kill someone, then I’ve got some gorgeous coastal property in Montana I’d love to sell ya for super cheap

There may be more of us than there are of them, sure, but bullets are cheap

“The tree of liberty must be watered regularly with the blood of tyrants and patriots.” - Thomas Jefferson

I hope one day we can form a society that will prove Mr. Jefferson to be incorrect…

How dare you interrupt his mental gymnastic exhibition with silly things like logic and facts

Wait, I’m sorry, what part of either of these is awesome? I’m lost… If A is the case, whether she had sex with someone else or not is immaterial to the discussion. If she thinks OP is someone else, for all intents and purposes, he is, at least as far as our discussion goes, which makes her a cheater. If B is the case and OP indeed is okay with being cucked (whether it’s by himself or not) I would argue that without both parties involved in the relationship having previously agreed to such an arrangement it is, once again, still infidelity and ergo decidedly not awesome.

Although, C) Ultimately none of this matters because D) OP wouldn’t remember either way, regardless and E) none of this happened to begin with anyway, so… Shenanigans.