Why not?

If something that should at worst be called vandalism is considered terrorism what’s preventing activists from just doing actual terrorism?

I like the concept. I don’t know how it would work in practice.

I think it would ultimately end up fragmented, especially when funding gets involved.

Who makes the decision for what gets funded? What is that decision process?

I think there will be space for a community funded news non-profit, but also I think NPR is already primed to fill that void.

I think an aggregated approach is more “Fediverse” like. But once again, who decides what does/doesn’t get published?

I think if those decisions and how they’re made are transparent, that would increase credibility, but it would end up being silo’ed because people like to read/watch things that they already agree with.

As I said earlier, I think PBS & NPR are primed to take on this kind of role. Personally I would love some more non-profit news reporting organizations.