Donald Trump on Monday, January 19 threatened 200% tariffs on French wine and champagne over France’s intentions to decline the US leader’s invitation to join his “board of peace.” The board was originally conceived to oversee the rebuilding of war-torn Gaza, but the charter does not appear to limit its role to the occupied Palestinian territory.
“I’ll put a 200% tariff on his wines and champagnes. And he’ll join. But he doesn’t have to join,” Trump said, referring to French President Emmanuel Macron. A source close to Macron told AFP on Monday that France “does not intend to answer favorably” to the invitation.
The board’s charter “goes beyond the sole framework of Gaza,” the source close to the French president said.



It’s called Protected Desigination of Origin and there a quite a lot of products covered by it.
That’s always something that I’ve found interesting. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but it’s one perceived imaginary line over from where other ducks are…. It can’t be called a duck?
It’s basically the same as trademark law. Anyone can make interlocking plastic bricks, but only Lego can make Lego.
That’s actually a route I never thought of. We’ve closely conflated the name with the type that I don’t think about it that way. So really rather than a specific section for “champagne”, it should actually be a section for “sparkling wines” of which champagne would be in there.
Though that being said, usually a trademark is given to a single company. In this case it’s multiple companies using it, which is where it gets rocky. (Bourbon is another one too)
Oh it can be called a duck, but not a “Mallard”, “wood duck” or something specific like that unless it is from that species
All tequilas are agave distillates, but not all agave distillates are tequilas.
Tequila is an agave distillate, but unless it is from the specific region using an specific type of agave it can’t be called tequila
I’m thinking more of you’re using the exact same berry, use the same exact processs, but you just happened to be less than 60 miles north in Belgium, an imaginary line says you can’t call it Champaign. It’s just weird.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_trademark
Protection of origin is different than trademarks. Its meant to represent the origin and the cultural value of product and product carrying the name must be made in a way and with the ingrediends that reflect the original.
Like anybody can make salad cheese, but its only feta when its made in Creese using lamb and goat milk.
Beside your generic trademark point is moot.
“Whether or not a mark is popularly identified as genericized, the owner of the mark may still be able to enforce the proprietary rights that attach to the use or registration of the mark, as long as the mark continues to exclusively identify the owner as the commercial origin of the applicable products or services.”
Also there are generaly very specific requirements on how things are made for them to fall under a Protected Origin, so for example in the age when pretty much all industrially made smoked meats are filled with nitrites and other preservatives, Parma Ham is literally still only made with pork meat and salt, nothing else (so the quality is far greater than the modern version of similar products which do not have that Protected Origin, many of which even have chemicals added to them to “accelerate the cure” so that they can be made faster).
Another example: Manchego Cheese isn’t just cheese made in specific area of Spain, it’s actually has to be made in a certain way using the milk of a specific breed of sheep called Manchega (hence the name of the cheese).