However, Tuinman then went on to say that if the worst case scenario does come to fruition he believes that, through unknown means, the F-35’s software could be altered without permission by third party operators. He compared this directly to ‘jailbreaking’ an iPhone, a process which allows end users to access features on iOS devices that are not usually allowed by Apple’s own software at the cost of theoretically voiding the device’s warranty and opening up the risk of security vulnerabilities or software malfunctions.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    The problem is not a hypothetical kill switch (which is unlikely in a fighter aircraft, as there’s no reliable way of having a back door only the good guys can use, and any possibility of enemy hackers pwning your jets is a nightmare scenario).

    Wait, do you think they would not do that simply because it is a bad idea?

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I can imagine the Trump administration ordering a kill switch to be put into the export version, explicitly disregarding any concerns. I can also imagine the kill switch being vibe coded by some Big Balls-style bros on secondment from one of Musk’s companies, and North Korean hackers finding it immediately.

    • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Imagine the stock price once one her is confirmed hacked/kill switched. Every global ally using the platform stops using it and the maintenance contracts and buy orders are cancelled.

      Any defence company would refuse to build something that, if actually used, destroys the company.

      It didn’t stop then releasing a software update at any time that could do the same though, so… still a sort of valid fear, if international relations were already crumbling and the order book was empty etc