• Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    No, a lack of evidence for determinism is a lack of evidence for determinism.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yet there’s a mountain of evidence efor determinism? Magnitudes more than for…non-determanism.

        • minorkeys@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If you drop something, it falls and will do so consistently if the context is similar enough. Every object that moves and can be accurately predicted, like all the planets and stars in the sky.

          I’m not going to continue with someone who can’t admit to the observable causation that governs the movement of their own body ffs.

          • Wren@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I’m less enthusiastic about someone who can’t cite peer reviewed sources. Your arguments are anecdotal at best.

            Astrophysics on a macro scale can only be predicted within a margin of error. Particle and light physics are less predictable. Source: Already posted them.