• Yeahigotskills2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t know what to say about that. I feel kinda conflicted. On one hand sexualising school kids is, to my mind, abhorrent. But banning certain clothing in porn seems like overreach and consenting adults should be able to dress as they like. Dunno.

    • Duckxon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      I don’t think they are targeting what people are doing in private. Just what can be accessed publicly. And it’s just ONE outfit… so it shouldn’t be seen as such a sacrifice, knowing it would make teenage girls feel less sexualised…

  • HolidayGreed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    Are we to believe these 14 and 15 year old girls watched pornography featuring adults dressed in school uniforms, and then decided it is abhorrant and should be banned?

    This isn’t their agenda, they’re being used to echo somebody else’s beliefs, likely an adult with a duty of care to them, which itself is concerning.

    • UiUiUiUiUi@piefed.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago


      Sorry I don’t follow how does this even look similar to an average highschool girl? Teacher student power dynamics are not just for pedos & often acted out on a collage setting 18+.

      • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        There are people interested in the power dynamics and there are people interested in women who look like children and watch it for that reason. You can pretend the latter don’t exist but you’d be wrong.

        • UiUiUiUiUi@piefed.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I’m not pretending, you are just promoting anti porn propaganda using predators as excuse. Tell me how many times have Ofcomm asked British pornstars and prostitutes on their opinion? I’m sorry they’re too busy talking with Christian religious nuts and Peter Thiel

          • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Where have I said anything about being anti-porn?

            I have a problem with porn that depicts underage girls and the men who are interested in underage girls.

            • UiUiUiUiUi@piefed.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              No problems there, but the law that’s proposed is too vague and subjective not to be seen as yet another step towards the anti porn rhetoric.