Actually no. The USA breached several of the clauses in the MoU immediately after signing it. Including threatening the life of negitiators (in violation of #1 and #2), and trying to divert traffic through the shallow southern coast of the Persian Gulf (in violation of #5).
Okay, let’s clarify. The Islamabad MoU was signed on June 15. As per clause §1, the parties agreed to end hostilities on all fronts and explicitly in Lebanon. Hezbollah agreed. Israel did not, and continued to attack Beirut every day, with the USA’s blessing. The USA could have done any number of things to try to reign in their rabid dog, even something performative, but elected not to do so.
That’s the breach of the ceasefire, and it’s the background to the other breaches of the MoU by the USA that I mentioned above.
I’m explaining why world events are unfolding how they are. Right or wrong, Iran’s view is that the USA could wield massive influence over Israel’s actions with regard to their genocide and their war against Lebanon. The USA and Iran agreed that an end to the hostilities in Lebanon was §1, but the USA did nothing to honor it.
You’re correct that Israel didn’t get a seat at the negotiating table. Nor should they have one. They should get told in no uncertain terms to stop their fucking genocide or face consequences, by their master the USA. Failing that, it’s going to be Hormuz blockade and Red Sea blockade, and now those things are a reality.
The next step is to fuck over Israel’s gas shipments via Azerbaijan by the way.
To get peace in Lebanon, Iran needs to shut down Hezbollah. They never took steps there either. So in that regard, Iran immediately broke #1 by your definition and that explains why things are how they are
Hezbollah agreed to stop fighting and they virtually kept their word for a month while Israel bombed Beirut every single day. We know who the real aggressors are, incapable of making a deal, and it’s the United States and their dog Israel.
If Hezbollah hadn’t attacked Israel 3 years ago there wouldn’t even be a conflict in Lebanon today. All those people would have been alive. All those buildings would be standing
But you seem to ‘know’ what’s the real issue and only pick out what reinforces it
Everything written previously was incorrect. The Lebanese government did not give Israel permission to strike Hezbollah. If it had, it wouldn’t be a ceasefire. The agreement explicitly states that the Lebanese government not Israel is responsible for disarming Hezbollah.
The agreement with Lebanon states that Israel can retain it’s buffer zone and ‘defend itself’ while Lebanon tries to disarm Hezbollah and remove them from the south
What would you think happens when Hezbollah attacks Israel or Israeli troops during that time? Do you feel the agreement means the Israelis have to sit back and take it?
No, the agreement do not tell Israel they can strike back and israeli is even attacking the official lebanese armt.
What would you think happens when Hezbollah attacks Israel or Israeli troops during that time? Do you feel the agreement means the Israelis have to sit back and take it?
Israel was occupying shabaa farms and Hezbollah attacked it during october 8. Israeli as the illegal occupier has zero right to do anything against who they occupy . In the fake 2024 cease fire, Israel also broke it from day 1. They always do it. Fuck you and all your family for defending the terrorist state of Israel
You should really look into the history of Shabaa farms. It was disputed between Lebanon and Syria before the whole attack on Israel over the Golan Heights thingie. Territory around Israel changed hands in the half a century of wars and not just in the north. Half the world would be at war if we could never get over disputed territories like these.
The usa broke the mou so Iran has the right to nullify it. The mou state that only iran and oman would have to decide together how to manage the straight, the usa still tried to create alternative routes so it could restart full scale war
The mou say oman and Iran would manage the straight together meaning them will have control of it, the usa wanted to create alternate routes inside the straight to continue the full scale war… the usa is breach the second term which is the usa need to force Israel out of Lebanon
Iran should use its best efforts to let commercial vessels pass safely with no charge for 60 days
Iran will conduct dialog with Oman to define the future administration in the Strait
Can you cite the parts from the MoU where you read that “an alternative route (I assume not passing by Iran and paying a toll) would restart full scale war”?
It’s was Iran that resumed attacks after the ‘ceasefire’, after internal opposition flared up against the politicians that had agreed to it
Actually no. The USA breached several of the clauses in the MoU immediately after signing it. Including threatening the life of negitiators (in violation of #1 and #2), and trying to divert traffic through the shallow southern coast of the Persian Gulf (in violation of #5).
That’s not the ceasefire part but ok, how do you see ships passing the Strait as a violation of #5?
Okay, let’s clarify. The Islamabad MoU was signed on June 15. As per clause §1, the parties agreed to end hostilities on all fronts and explicitly in Lebanon. Hezbollah agreed. Israel did not, and continued to attack Beirut every day, with the USA’s blessing. The USA could have done any number of things to try to reign in their rabid dog, even something performative, but elected not to do so.
That’s the breach of the ceasefire, and it’s the background to the other breaches of the MoU by the USA that I mentioned above.
It feels like you’re just throwing stuff at the wall here
The USA never interfered in Lebanon and Israel doesn’t have anything to do with the MoU.
Israel even has agreements with Lebanon allowing them to strike back at Hezbollah
So we went from “USA breached the ceasefire first” to “Hezbollah and Israel never stopped fighting”
I’m explaining why world events are unfolding how they are. Right or wrong, Iran’s view is that the USA could wield massive influence over Israel’s actions with regard to their genocide and their war against Lebanon. The USA and Iran agreed that an end to the hostilities in Lebanon was §1, but the USA did nothing to honor it.
You’re correct that Israel didn’t get a seat at the negotiating table. Nor should they have one. They should get told in no uncertain terms to stop their fucking genocide or face consequences, by their master the USA. Failing that, it’s going to be Hormuz blockade and Red Sea blockade, and now those things are a reality.
The next step is to fuck over Israel’s gas shipments via Azerbaijan by the way.
To get peace in Lebanon, Iran needs to shut down Hezbollah. They never took steps there either. So in that regard, Iran immediately broke #1 by your definition and that explains why things are how they are
Hezbollah agreed to stop fighting and they virtually kept their word for a month while Israel bombed Beirut every single day. We know who the real aggressors are, incapable of making a deal, and it’s the United States and their dog Israel.
If Hezbollah hadn’t attacked Israel 3 years ago there wouldn’t even be a conflict in Lebanon today. All those people would have been alive. All those buildings would be standing
But you seem to ‘know’ what’s the real issue and only pick out what reinforces it
Israeli top leaders said they want a greater israel. Stop with your lies and fuck off .
And Hezbollah top leaders said they want a islamic state in the place of Israel
Maybe it would be better if they just leave eachother alone?
Everything written previously was incorrect. The Lebanese government did not give Israel permission to strike Hezbollah. If it had, it wouldn’t be a ceasefire. The agreement explicitly states that the Lebanese government not Israel is responsible for disarming Hezbollah.
You’re very close to seeing the light
The agreement with Lebanon states that Israel can retain it’s buffer zone and ‘defend itself’ while Lebanon tries to disarm Hezbollah and remove them from the south
What would you think happens when Hezbollah attacks Israel or Israeli troops during that time? Do you feel the agreement means the Israelis have to sit back and take it?
No, the agreement do not tell Israel they can strike back and israeli is even attacking the official lebanese armt.
Israel was occupying shabaa farms and Hezbollah attacked it during october 8. Israeli as the illegal occupier has zero right to do anything against who they occupy . In the fake 2024 cease fire, Israel also broke it from day 1. They always do it. Fuck you and all your family for defending the terrorist state of Israel
You should really look into the history of Shabaa farms. It was disputed between Lebanon and Syria before the whole attack on Israel over the Golan Heights thingie. Territory around Israel changed hands in the half a century of wars and not just in the north.
Halfthe world would be at war if we could never get over disputed territories like these.I wish you and your family peace and happiness
Iran attacked vessels that didn’t pay the toll.
Well, then the US attacked IRGC targets that “didn’t pay the toll”
Quite the ceasefire
Oh fuck off.
Brb imma go to the nearest intersection here and “extract some tolls” from passersby
Hope they don’t make me break the ceasefire!
Please stay there and away from us.
The usa broke the mou so Iran has the right to nullify it. The mou state that only iran and oman would have to decide together how to manage the straight, the usa still tried to create alternative routes so it could restart full scale war
That might be how some in Iran read it, but that’s not what the mou says
It is exactly what the mou said
Maybe if you read it with Iran goggles lol
No, i read it as it is
How do ships sailing through the Strait stop Iran from talking to Oman?
The mou say oman and Iran would manage the straight together meaning them will have control of it, the usa wanted to create alternate routes inside the straight to continue the full scale war… the usa is breach the second term which is the usa need to force Israel out of Lebanon
The MoU says that
Can you cite the parts from the MoU where you read that “an alternative route (I assume not passing by Iran and paying a toll) would restart full scale war”?