This isn’t so strong on the coding part, but touch in some degree on this regard. The focus is on the data storage and access of data. I hope you like this post.
All feedback is welcome.
You must log in or # to comment.
Your entire blog post boils down to “Someone else is going to store my data for me” and you hand-wave away any of the big questions about who’s going to pay for the cooling, power, storage, backups, administration, wages, and everything else. I would be happy to provide this service, but you’d need to pay me.
we need more data centers for the government to hold your data
Uh, no. That’s not the solution either.
With the right push from the government, we can make age verification enforceable, and we can also add one extra detail to this list.
Get the fuck out of here with your boot-licking blog.
There is a use for age verification. Most people’s problem with is is that 1) the implementations are security and privacy disaster. 2) overzealous application.
I agree, on the past I had a proposal that the OS should have a device level API to provide this information, in this case apps and (the browser as an APP) would be able to consume this information from the device. And it’s up to the device manufacturer (or the OS installed) to add a age system.
I not denying that there is holes in this idea. Linux users could simply add a simple form with “I was born 01-01-1900” and everything would continue the same. But on the MicroSlop, Gargle and iPear worlds, they would be able to validate once and keep the information on the device. And each webpage, app and such won’t be able to ingest your personal/private data.
On this post, I do explore little bit this, but I do focus on the idea of storage and access of data.
That was a little bit agressive. I’ll give you the opportunity to learn from your mistake and discuss what bother you in this blog post.
I refuse to soften my tone. Typical piefed user.
Tagged as Fedposter.“Please, Daddy government. Come own me.”
No explanation needed. You are willingly rolling out a red carpet for fascist governments. The best way to deal with a fascist is zero tolerance.
Did you read the post?
It’s not that. It’s clearly a distrust (which is also part of the post).
But the problem with trust can be solved with “how to access data”.Edit.
Since you clearly didn’t read here a snippet[…] if you don’t trust the government, the encrypted data is useless to the government, and we can audit it, including audit by private companies. So even if we don’t trust the government, it can work.[…]
[…] If a company can’t store my personal data, how can they access it? […]
If you don’t trust, that’s fine. This is good. Government should be transparent, and should be auditable. To be honest we have close ideas, and we want the same thing (I guess), privacy and security for our data.
(and keep our data away from datahouses and bigtech)
