Heidegger thinks about tools like so: a tool is something (a thing that has being in the Heideggerian sense, not necessarily an object) that represents an extension of human capabilities in some way. A tool is thus any kind of thing that *lets you do something you wouldn't otherwise have been able to*. The important (for us) conceptual leap here is that when a tool works well, or isn't broken, it develops what Heidegger describes as a "ready-to-hand" quality: the tool fades into the background as a kind of human-tool gestalt of a human with the additional capability afforded by a tool forms. As a simple example of this, consider eating with a fork. When the fork is well-designed and not broken, *you don't explicitly have "I am using a fork" in your conscious mind while eating dinner*.
reading that last sentence is the first time i’ve ever thought “wow i hope this person starts hating their job again” but damn, the way you phrased that is exactly why they’re pushing it so hard
reading that last sentence is the first time i’ve ever thought “wow i hope this person starts hating their job again” but damn, the way you phrased that is exactly why they’re pushing it so hard
:(