Also there isn’t a law anyway because international “law” has no courts, no judges, no juries, no enforcement machanism at all other than pure might. Nation states are not beholden to any law but their own, and only then insofar as the ruling class allows
Doesn’t this fit in the definition of state terrorism?
Without consequences laws are just words.
Also there isn’t a law anyway because international “law” has no courts, no judges, no juries, no enforcement machanism at all other than pure might. Nation states are not beholden to any law but their own, and only then insofar as the ruling class allows
So basically any politician.
A popular sentiment, but failing to differentiate those who are against things like this leads to not voting because “both sides”.
They do stuff that fits the definitions for a lot of things but it doesn’t seem to matter
They are a terror “state”. They just have enough blackmail and money to force others to turn a blind eye