slothrop@lemmy.ca to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 5 days agoSpotify and Major Music Labels Sue Anna’s Archive for $13 Trillionhackread.comexternal-linkmessage-square103linkfedilinkarrow-up1370arrow-down14
arrow-up1366arrow-down1external-linkSpotify and Major Music Labels Sue Anna’s Archive for $13 Trillionhackread.comslothrop@lemmy.ca to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square103linkfedilink
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·4 days agoSpotify doesn’t even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway? Also this isn’t even stealing just a digital copy sent by spotify servers
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·4 days agoProbably theorizing every potential peer is pulling the whole archive. So net worth * 100.000 potential peers = $$$
minus-squareɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·4 days agoPerhaps Anna can pay them off with theoretical potential money too? Like, a big collection of monkey NFTs.
minus-squarerbn@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days ago Spotify doesn’t even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway? Because it was stolen already. By Anna’s archive. Isn’t that obvious!?
Spotify doesn’t even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway? Also this isn’t even stealing just a digital copy sent by spotify servers
Probably theorizing every potential peer is pulling the whole archive.
So net worth * 100.000 potential peers = $$$
Perhaps Anna can pay them off with theoretical potential money too? Like, a big collection of monkey NFTs.
Or exposure.
Because it was stolen already. By Anna’s archive. Isn’t that obvious!?