I’m tempted to try a 32er

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s to do with the changes in modern geometry. 27.5 and to an even more extent 29 are much smoother rolling than a 26 because the larger contact patch lets you roll over larger holes and bumps. 26s are still great but nowadays are used more for pump track or trick bikes since they tend to be lighter and more maneuverable.

    • Mucki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just the bike industry trying to convince everyone you need something new and special like “all you friends from downhilling”. Money making is the aim. I would stick with 26ers.

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Anyone who has ridden a larger wheelbase can tell you you’re wrong. 27.5 and 29 are much smoother than 26 because of physics. Smaller wheel size falls into holes easier and you feel every bump.

        Hell there are even 32 and 36 for taller riders starting to show up and some enduro riders have considered swapping to 32 for the added smoothness.

        • Mucki@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, going to put 32" on my city cargo bike haha. Smoother rides can also be achieved with more rubber like a higher tyre. Doesn’t it?

          • teft@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            For sure but you’ll often run into issues putting wider tires on. Most frames only accept a narrow range of widths. I ride a 27.5 with 2.8” tires which makes the outside diameter just about the same as a 29x2.3” but with more cushion. My old bones can’t handle the impact from a bad rim hit any more.