ICE Wants Power to Detain Immigrants for Months or Years Without Bond Hearings
www.americansagainstice.org
The Supreme Court will hear a case that could strip another layer of due process from immigration detention.

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/48421964

The Court has agreed to hear a Trump administration appeal involving lawful permanent residents who were detained for months without a chance to ask for release on bond. A lower court ruled that prolonged detention without bond hearings violated due process protections. The administration is now asking the Supreme Court to reverse that ruling.

This is not a technical court dispute for the people inside detention. A bond hearing can be the only chance to ask a judge to look at whether continued detention is justified. Without that hearing, ICE can keep someone locked up while the immigration case moves slowly through the system.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pubOPEnglish
    4·
    1 month ago

    What makes you think the supreme court cares about what is constitutional?

    I have no faith in the judical branch. But even if I did, this regime has ignored the courts before.

    • YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      1 month ago

      Biden v. Texas (2022) - The SCOTUS respected that the Constitution allocated the executive power for Biden to turn over the “Remain in Mexico” immigration program.

      Torres v. Texas DPS (2022) - The SCOTUS supported Congress’s constitutional war powers to protect veterans employment right by allowing them to sue states.

      Moody v. NetChoice (2024) - The SCOTUS upheld the 1st Amendment by rejecting state efforts to control social media content moderation.

      Allen v. Milligan (2023) - The SCOTUS protected voting rights and enforced contitutional equality principles by upholding a a Voting Rights Act challenge to Alabama’s congressional map.

      Additional cases that show the SCOTUS will decide against the Trump admin on many topics:

      DHS v. Regents of the University of California (2020) - prevented the Tramp admin from ending DACA

      Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) - The SCOTUS upheld Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

      Trump v. Mzars USA, LLP (2020) - The SCOTUS rejected Trump’s claim that Congress could not obtain financial records

      Department of Commerce v. New York (2019) - The SCOTUS blocked Trump’s effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census