The main reason why this process isn’t “something for nothing” is that it takes twice as much electrical energy to produce energy in the form of gasoline. As Aircela told The Autopian:

Aircela is targeting >50% end to end power efficiency. Since there is about 37kWh of energy in a gallon of gasoline we will require about 75kWh to make it. When we power our machines with standalone, off-grid, photovoltaic panels this will correspond to less than $1.50/gallon in energy cost.

Doesn’t it sort of defeat the purpose of gasoline being used because it’s so energy dense? Like, this seems to suggest little more than the benefits of electrification in transport.

  • ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    many years ago there where bio reactors using algae to trap CO2 and later process those algae into fuel. does anybody know what happened to them?

    just off my gut feeling, these should be more efficient. the algae does a big part of the steps basically for free. additionally, a chemical process to transform things sounds less energy costly, than smashing building blocks together yourself…