• Maeve@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Mhmm, really digging your expansion here as an addendum to our earlier conversation on the same subject.

      • Maeve@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Thank you, for taking the time. I honestly can’t wait for their next argument to learn even more!

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  If anything, debate-culture is dominant in liberal spaces, not Marxist. We should try to take a dialectical approach to education and self-education.

                  • Maeve@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    I understand you. What I’m saying, for example, if I am considering between a green salad, fruit, or smoothie for lunch, my argument for greens would be iron content, fruit argument may be for the C content, smoothie would be “I can get both.” But in the United States, we’re taught “argument” is disagreement, or negative. So yes. I do agree we can take a dialectical approach, which if I’m understanding it correctly, takes contradiction in ideas and basically does the same as my lunch example? But I’m still grappling with my understanding of the word, so there’s also that. As a side note, it occurs to me dialectics informs your style when correcting us on misconceptions (and also wondering if it’s your general disposition to be so patient and good natured, or if understanding and practicing dialectics had lent extension to any degree)?