Would have a point. If this was about him facing charges.
But it’s his employer. Any one who has worked knows Thier employer will never support this when acting in their name.
If you work retail even security no company is going to let you act to stop violence when in their name. They all make it clear to employees. Let the criminal go. Otherwise the company is too worried about taking responsibility for any harm customer or criminal.
Violence is only acceptable when state-sanctioned, everyone knows this
Would have a point. If this was about him facing charges.
But it’s his employer. Any one who has worked knows Thier employer will never support this when acting in their name.
If you work retail even security no company is going to let you act to stop violence when in their name. They all make it clear to employees. Let the criminal go. Otherwise the company is too worried about taking responsibility for any harm customer or criminal.
It may not be right. But hardly a suprise.