• KaRunChiy@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Actually hate all the comments on that post. I used to bum around cafés all the time years ago and nobody gave a shit. It’s a recent development where they’ll kick you out for not buying anything. Like hey you never actually get busy enough to use all these tables so why do you care?

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Where I live most cafes are small, local places, not some chains. Who’s boots I’m supposedly licking? Cafe owners’ boots? That’s just stupid.

        I simply don’t consider private business to be places where I have the right to use for free. That’s what public spaces are. Third places include gyms or theaters. I don’t assume I can hang out there without paying. I wouldn’t go to a restaurant and expect to be seated without ordering anything. When I want to sit in some cafe I at least order a coffee. If I want to hang out I go to a park or a beach.

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I think businesses have obligations to the communities they serve, and one of the traditional obligations of cafes and coffee shops is to provide third spaces for people in that community to rest, drink, and converse.

            I honestly never heard of such obligation. Maybe it’s an American idea? Where I live we have communal recreational areas where people can organize picnics, free breaches, a lot of buildings have swimming pools, we have parks, libraries… I never heard that a bar, a business selling drinks and food, has a obligation to provide third space. It’s like saying that a barber or local ISP have to let me hang out at their property because they offer services to community.

            And if you’re not a business owner, defending that business’s property and profits over the good of the community sounds very much like licking boot to me.

            Of course small business owners should have their property protected. The idea that just because someone makes a living by selling services to people he doesn’t deserve anything and has some debt to said community makes no sense to me. It’s a business. He offers a service and if the service is good community will support it. People don’t have obligation to go there and he doesn’t have obligation to give out anything for free. You’re talking about it like he go to run some public space that the community gave him for free in exchange for providing a service. That’s not how it works. There’s nothing done “over the good of community”. they are renting private property and provides a service from it. If the service is good it’s good for the community that it’s there. If it’s bad it doesn’t really matter. It’s not like he’s stealing public space from community to make money.

            The licking boot thing is just stupid. I don’t have kids. If I support public childcare and I licking parents’ boots? I own my apartment. If I support rights of renters and I licking their boots? How that’s different from supporting small business owners? Sounds like some socialist brainrot. “Everyone who owns a business is evil and we have to hate them”.