• HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The internet has many strange rules, one of the unwritten ones is “if little Timmy wants titties, little Timmy is going to find titties”.

    No matter how you hard you try, you’re not going to stop this phenomenon. You’ll just push kids to sites that refuse to comply (usually the dodgy ones), or inhabit grey areas (a lot of streamer content counts as softcore), or they’ll get Nd a workaround (current VPN situation), or they’ll just gaslight an AI model into generating porn.

    Trying to block access isn’t viable as there is always a work around, what is needed is someone sitting down with a kid to put it into context. That’s not the job of the government, that’s the job of a parent.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Good. Pornhub had been shit for years now, this will give competitors some breathing room there

  • Johnnyvibrant@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    And so opens the floodgates to even more “free” porn sites with loads of stolen content they simply ask chatgpt to scrape for them on an hour by hour basis.

    This is so stupid, the internet cannot be stopped or controlled.

    • loops@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      The number of people shilling for pornographers who prey on kids on this site smh

      • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hey, you’ve made a few comments about pornography, an adult topic. Please submit a selfie with your ID for age verification purposes.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          You didn’t do it in 60 seconds. All police officers within a 10 mile radius have been diverted to your area

        • loops@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Commenting on porn is not an age related activity. Selling porn is shg

          • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Age verification failed. Unfortunately I cannot continue this conversation with a possible child. Please verify your age with a selfie including your ID.

            We need to protect children, we wouldn’t want random adults talking about pornography to kids on social media. Normally I’d assume you either have a contract with an internet provider (therefore are an adult) or have consent from an adult to be online, but as you are from the UK I cannot make that assumption.

              • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Age verification failed. Unfortunately I cannot continue this conversation with a possible child. Please verify your age with a selfie including your ID.

                • loops@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  that’s okay I’ll chat with my MP about the OSA offline. I’ll thank them for voting for it.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Right, and Pornhub, like all mainstream porn websites, carries an RTA flag that trips all standards compliant content blockers. The black-market sites which the government is pushing traffic to do not, so it’s up to the blocker developers to make best guesses.

      Not that parents bother with the blockers anyway.

    • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Most parents apparently don’t agree with you, or are too lazy to do anything:

      back in 2011 the government worked with ISPs (internet service providers) to come up with a Code of Practice on implementing ‘parental controls’ for all new customers. In 2013 this was adopted by all the major players. So when you (an adult – because you have to be over 18 to do this) register for an internet connection, you are offered adult content filtering by default. You can tweak this, if you like, for example you can decide you’re happy for your family to access social media sites but not pornography. Or if you don’t anticipate any children using your connection, you can opt out of adult filters altogether. Research conducted in 2022, however, found that although 61% of parents were aware of these filters, only 27% actually used them

      From: https://www.girlonthenet.com/blog/age-verification-whats-the-harm/

      • waz@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I was aware of this and used it exactly as intended, set an age appropriate filter setting, with a watershed to switch to “18” in the evening. When the kids got old enough to stay up past this watershed, I decided to run the age limiters settings 24hrs and instead allow vpn as the only route for me as an adult to access the ‘adult internet’ Paired with parental controls on their devices, worked fine. Included in this was conversations with the children about their devices, what usage time looked like, internet safety and as an aside we had no TVs in bedrooms.
        Guess what? It took a little effort and had to be consistent. I guess most parents are lazy.

        • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s honestly maddening that we’re being subjected to this mass surveillance in the name of preventing children seeing porn when we’ve had much more effective tools for decades now. An OS or ISP level DNS filter takes more work to get around than just finding a more shady website. Microsoft, to its credit, have pretty good parental controls built into their OSs (Windows + Xbox).

          But it’s like I’ve said before, this isn’t about preventing kids seeing porn; it’s about preventing adults seeing porn because the political class finds it icky.

          • waz@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The windows/xbox parental controls never worked for me, luckily it would have only been for screen time, so we managed that the old fashioned way. (After countless MS support calls on an OEM prebuilt machine too!) The apple mac parental controls were faultless both MacOS and iOS.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            But it’s like I’ve said before, this isn’t about preventing kids seeing porn; it’s about preventing adults seeing porn because the political class finds it icky.

            This is bollocks and lazy thinking.

            It is about preventing kids from seeing porn, but the people who support this lack the knowledge and intelligence to understand that it does more harm than good.

            • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              The government absolutely has access to people with the knowledge to tell them that this approach wouldn’t work, Aylo (the company who owns Pornhub) has been advocating for device based age verification for years (Yes, Aylo are a shitty company, but they’re right about this and have been vocal about it). But sure, a piece of Tory legislation, the same Tories who banned porn with bondage and even women ejaculating in 2014, didn’t choose this approach because it’d discourage adults accessing porn.

              • FishFace@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                What makes you think that, because someone will have told the government something, that means they believe them? That’s always the missing link in this argument.

                It’s what makes me think it’s a failure to mentalise other people. “It’s so obvious” I imagine you thinking, “anyone can see that it won’t work!”

                But no, not anyone can. Some people are dumb. Some people are smart but have a blind spot.

                • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  This is just getting into pure speculation now, neither of us knows for sure. It just lines up too perfectly with the Tories history of anti-porn stances for me to believe that it wasn’t a motivating factor in choosing this approach to others that were pitched to the government (the lobbying from the age verification industry probably helped as well).

    • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think anyone disagrees with that, but the current “upload a video of your face, a copy of your passport and your full name and address to a criminal company based in Cypress” combined with “if you don’t implement it you must block the UK” is one of the most stupid, dangerous and incompetent things I’ve seen for weeks.

      It’s not just porn being blocked. It’s Discord servers, Twitter, image hosters, other hosting websites, media websites, images on websites, international companies’ websites, tech support, equipment manufacturers, fucking paint suppliers.

      It’s a sack of badly thought-out shit by bell-ends. An opt-in from a mobile phone provider or ISP, plus some parental controls was all we needed. Now we can’t order some fucking specialist paint for work, and the pictures in the online safety manual all say “not available in your region”.

      At least we’ll soon be able to buy a pack of 1000 stolen uploaded British passports and photos for £50.

      • loops@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sounds like your paint company has misunderstood the law. Or sells porn on the side

        Glad we agree that Pornhub should be age verified though. Because selling porn to kids is abhorrent

        Moving forward companies that don’t sell porn can stop over reacting. As can you all

    • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think pornography WILL be seen by anyone who looks for it. If you want kids not to be fucked up by it you’re going to have to get over yourself and have that conversation you’re scared of having with them.

      • loops@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        When I was 14 a shopkeeper sold us single cigs for 50p shg. If you want to break the law there’s a way and usually someone willing to make some money. Doesn’t make smoking at 14 right.

        Happy to have the convo with my kids and for part of that to be “don’t break the law”. Also expect them to break the law. Happy for that to be part of learning what is healthy from unhealthy.