• RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago
    • This assumes latency between one’s current location and the remote location is almost non-existent. It isn’t.
    • This assumes we have fast and available internet all the time. I sure don’t.
    • This assumes we can use the remote computer in every way we use our current computers. No way.
    • This assumes, as you point out, they won’t be greedy once they control everyone’s machines. They will be.
    • This assumes they won’t censor ‘dangerous’ sites on these machines. They will.

    I will happily pay more for freedom from the corporation.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Modern desktop streaming is quite impressive. 100ms, 5% loss is no problem for most tasks. You don’t even notice it, and as a result your experience can sometimes be better.

      Additionally you can offload some tasks to the local machine where appropriate.

      You dont need to fit every users needs into a thin client setup, but you could fit probably 50% of all users onto one and they wouldn’t know any different. Think of the energy savings. Think of all that plastic that goes into a desktop or laptop that isn’t needed in a virtualized blade chassis. Think of the rolling performance upgrades. Think of never having your hardware go End of Support. Think of the old equipment that ends up properly e-wasted instead of shoved into a dump. Think of the batteries that no longer need to get produced.

      I might play around with this idea and host my own non-profit Desktop as a Service.