• vpol@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure Kia needs to be close to Germany. They just need cheap labour somewhere within the EU.

    • copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, that is my point. Also the final paragraph in the article:

      Meanwhile, Audi, Mercedes-Benz and Suzuki have facilities in Hungary, Ford and Renault are in Romania, and Ford is in Serbia. All are attracted by low wages, and a tradition of industry and educated workers.

      That means “cheap labor” does not explain why Slovakia specifically is the “number one carmaker”. Why not Hungary or Romania or Serbia?

      • Mavytan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The article also mentions something about the availability of low carbon emitting energy sources in Slovakia resulting in lower CO2 emissions per car produced. This seems to matter for car subsidies/tax breaks

      • claimsou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        There were talks of VW moving away from SK to Romania at some point. But it never happened. They just want low labor with a hint of qualification…

      • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why not Hungary or Romania or Serbia?

        Not sure if actually the reason, but none of those have the Euro.

      • vpol@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        my guess: to avoid competition. more competition - higher salaries.