I find this video very interesting because it explains a certain phenomenon that I have seen repeated in plenty of topics and sectors.

Even though this video talks about the beauty standards, I also see this white supremacist thinking from people in the global south in topics such as:

  • Resistance: “The white man is always right and the resistance should always be doubted”. You can see this when magically Trump turns into a trustworthy source for plenty of anti imperialist even though he lied too many times.

  • Geopolitical analysis and Western promoted OSINT. There is plenty of analysis that the mentally colonize overlook from Global South sources including the resistance.

The idea behind the video, which is the mental colonization and the white supremacist thinking shared by the global south, should be discussed way more.

Anyway, hope you like the video.

  • rainpizza@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    You are correct. In a healthy scenario where colonial and imperialist culture are non existent, it should be the case that beauty is defined by the local or regional context.

    Sadly, it doesn’t happen like that and we get data maps like this

    Whiteness in colonized countries tends to be the desire trait

    • lorty@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I really want to know where that map is from, because there’s no way it’s right for where I live. People do tan here a lot, and it’s a marker of beauty, but only when done naturally, by the Sun, and not with machines.

      • rainpizza@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I added the link to the post that has the map in my comment. In that link, they explain where they get the data.

        You can find the link if you click on “data maps”.

    • Kalashnikov@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Tanning is incredibly dangerous. It is literally burning your skin, destroying DNA in the process. It can give you skin cancer and ages your skin faster. It’s a bad idea. I don’t know how “skin-whitening”, which is the first I’m hearing of this, works, but I wouldn’t imagine it has no health disadvantages.

      I have no idea why anyone would want to change the color of their skin. It is literally a completely meaningless property. It makes no difference whatsoever. The idea that one might want to is uncomfortable to me.

      • Che's Motorcycle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Skin lightening products can be very dangerous, depending on their active ingredients. A common side effect is dermatitis, or inflammation characterized by itchiness, redness, and a rash. Many more severe reactions are possible as well, as shown in the fourth column here.

      • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’ll second Che’s Motorcycle’s comment about the dangers of skin whitening.

        As to the property of skin color, it’s a generally considered to be an evolutionary adaptation to environments from a time when humans rarely traveled very far from their birth places. Paler skin reduced vitamin D deficiencies in lower light environments, and darker skin reduced melanomas in high sunlight environments.

        Of course, in an era of suncreen and vitamin D pills, they are pretty much meaningless, though mid range skin tones have lower melanoma rates while retaining high likelihood of detecting melanomas early.