So you admit it yourself. They have the power to veto, because they don’t use it. The UN serves the empire. On a scale of total subservience to total opposition, abstaining in this context, is closer to the interests of the US than against it.
It’s exactly opposite to tactically denying to take part in bourgeois elections, in a situation where a large number of non-voter could actually critically de-legitimize the while system. Abstaining didn’t make any waves, did it?
So you admit it yourself. They have the power to veto, because they don’t use it. The UN serves the empire. On a scale of total subservience to total opposition, abstaining in this context, is closer to the interests of the US than against it.
It’s exactly opposite to tactically denying to take part in bourgeois elections, in a situation where a large number of non-voter could actually critically de-legitimize the while system. Abstaining didn’t make any waves, did it?