• Abundance114@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A doctor has no legal obligation or mandate to treat people; they have an obligation to not harm the patients they are treating.

      I’d love to see a timeline of the shooting until medical arrived, it’s probably jacked up but I don’t think immediately allowing anyone onto the scene is correct either.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Law enforcement officers have a legal obligation to render aid, which may include allowing a physician to treat an injured person at the scene of a shooting.

        • Abundance114@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Law enforcement officers have a legal obligation to render aid

          Even if we accept that point, which is debatable, they have higher priorities. They don’t have an officer involved shooting and then the second bullets stop flying everyone just goes into first aid mode.

          Securing the scene is a higher priority, even firefighters and EMTs aren’t allowed on scene until the scene is secured, so why should some random person who claims to be a doctor? Furthermore the police suddenly become liable for the safety of the individual rendering aid if they allow them on scene.

          This entire situation is exasperated by the presence of a hostile crowd, just like the George Floyd situation; had the police not been constantly threatened by an aggressive crowd they could have focused much more on the suspect that required aid.