The reason for that was probably because they were more well versed with C++ and learning Rust would require extra time and also that back then there were not enough frameworks, libraries and game engines available with Rust.
I see quite a few games being made using Rust nowadays thanks to increased availability.

has been deployed … already under investigation.

Is “already” really the word to use.
Don’t vehicles need the investigation being done before getting on the road?
I’d say the investigation started a bit too late.

In this case, it’s probably comparing AMD with some ARM based thingy.

I initially followed on their plans for that thing and from what I remember, they were going to include the older ones too.
But I’d think they would at least be willing to do something trivial like a rebuild for a big name like CERN, if they just called ‘support’.

“trivial”, because it doesn’t require many expensive man-hours, just an additional entry in whatever batch build config they use.

Client Server

Blue ink in a pot?

What if they run a rebase script that changes the timestamp or sth on every commit, before the reupload?

which gets rarer when you go into a technical career

Sorry, what?

I have found it hard to find a place with a non-bulshitting trend.
And it has become harder, the further I go.

Maybe I’m just unlucky.

So, if I were to do a bad re-encode, the result would be copyright-free?
Or not, because I didn’t pass it through AI?

Truly dumb laws.

Don’t ask us, ask AI.

Klearly you are not a KDE Kontributor.

Because it is easier to read large codebases of Python than large codebases of Bash.

Comment

Mr. NitrileNextTime.

Well, Babe❤️❤️ specifically said they guessed 3 of the 💍’s, so…

Well, perhaps if they just let me normally use it and transfer data without an internet connection and perhaps supported KDE Connect (considering their price tag), I might have considered buying one instead of just improvising a water resistant cover on a raspberry pi camera.

I think I should start checking if a poster has a history of regularly deleting posts/comments, before trying to give a useful answer.

For some reason, I read that as “15kg ring”.

Although, she might have meant 5k rings. 3 of them. 1 for her, 1 for him and 1 for whomsoever they are going to adulterate with.

There’s ambiguity in the above conversation.

1. The original post tells me that SWF has made the software and is giving it to ACQ; ACQ is asking SG for modification.

2. @litchralee@sh.itjust.works seems to understand it this way: ACQ has made the software and is giving it to SWF and wants SG to do further modifications.

3. The comment that I am replying to, won’t make @litchralee@sh.itjust.works (who is assuming [2.]) realise [1.].

∵ serious consequences.