

I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.


I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.


Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?


Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).


I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.


Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.


To be fair it’s kinda reassuring, if they had a professional PR team I’d be suspicious it’s a government honeypot.
Of course that could just be what they want us to think.


I wonder what the Graphene owner’s calm and reasonable response to this will be?


Most middle/early-modern English was written in a more “west country” accent.


They seem to have a questionable interpretation of the AGPL https://isitreallyfoss.com/projects/onlyoffice/
Considering the specific clause they cite allows
Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it
A logo isn’t attribution, and even if it was there’s no way it could be considered reasonable to require it if they don’t allow you to use it.
There’s a theory that Machiavelli, being an ardent republican, wrote “the prince” to deliberately give terrible advice.
I hear the new rotring 4 in 1 is pretty good, not as good as the original but it takes d1 refills so you can have a gel refill for smooth writing and a spacepen refill for writing on awkward things.


Where is god going to get lawyers from? The other guy has them all.


Example #42069 of why relying on vision alone for navigation is a terrible idea. At these speeds a $5 ultrasonic SONAR would’ve prevented this.


Republican Machiavelli? Or deliberately giving terrible advice to princes Machiavelli?
Either way he really hated mercenaries.


Paywall free link https://archive.ph/TYd4L


It’s always seemed odd to me that the boy scouts had to accept girls, but the girl guides didn’t have to accept boys.


Drug is also Russian for friend.


I just realised, the computer part is ironic since traditional fractions are a binary series. In binary 0.1 is 1/2, 0.01 is 1/4, 0.001 is 1/8, etc.


A rare outbreak of common sense.
It does worry me that “Zionism” could be considered a protected belief though. Surprised they didn’t go that route. I guess they didn’t want to risk a court ruling on if Zionism “conflicts with the fundamental rights of others”.
It confirmed that correspondence exists but refused to release any information, saying it would prejudice the department’s ability to offer “free and frank” advice in the future.
They should appeal to the ICO, it’s surprisingly easy. If an idiot like me can win there anyone can.
How fucking hard is it to put a $2 ultrasonic distance sensor on the front. I built robots when I was a kid that wouldn’t do this.
This has been solved for 50 years FFS. Yet here we are with techbros thinking cameras can solve everything.