Generally true, and yet:

https://www.nytimes.com/1973/07/17/archives/an-accused-pilot-being-sent-to-us-b52-pilot-refused-order-to-bomb.html

https://www.smh.com.au/world/middle-east/our-pilots-refused-to-bomb-40-times-20040314-gdijb4.html

Also, not a pilot, but an easy demonstration of the possibility:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov

There’s plenty of examples, even if they’re just a drop in the bucket of bootlicking.

Plus they won’t be able to refuse orders to fire on civilians

Being broke or screwed by exchange rates is also a valid reason.

https://www.koreajoongangdaily.com/korea/abes-pose-resurrects-horrors-of-unit-731/10058282

👍

And people wonder why I don’t give a single shit that two cities were destroyed with two big bombs instead of ten thousand little ones like every other city destroyed by a war they started.

It’s actually really funny that they mention US T-bonds as a time bomb in small print at the top then try to get boomers scared about Gen Z.

1: that’s a crack lawyer

2: it’s weird how hard it is to tell a Hexbear from a magat, isn’t it

Like that’s even a rounding error in a state budget

Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas

Someone explain the part of the legal code that means if two of them are found to be legally incompetent that means the third one who wasn’t and was, presumably, the leader, still gets the same treatment?

And $2trillion USD in direct payments to the industrial murder complex

Not when it comes to paying that bill it ain’t you’re on your own, dipshit

🤡

It’s actually really, really sad that you once again went to that well. Good luck with the rest of the LLM’s life, zombie.

Truly America is when Russia

There’s a reason why no one respects you IRL

Fun Fact: the Panic of 1837 was caused by Andrew Jackson’s idiotic idea to pay off the national debt by stealing land and selling it, which crashed the real estate market. Jackson had also refused to continue the American central banking charter so there were basically no tools to fight it.

He is literally Trump’s favorite president. You know, the real estate guy fighting with the Fed.

You’d use “individuals” in the second use of creature in this context, but short answer is yes, keeping in mind the definition of species is largely arbitrary.

There’s much more that goes into the definition than reproductive ability, so for example a lot of birds that are in theory different species are fully capable of breeding with a different bird species.

Then of course there’s the coywolves and coydogs. Fully fertile (as far as I know), arguably better adapted to the niche than either coyotes or wolves, they’ll probably be recognized as their own species at some point.

I’m sure that’s part of it but y’all really need to internalize that some people are just liars

Not sure if srs

Good luck proving it, strange screaming man on the corner with no viable preindustrial skills